This article contains an example of the structure of the final qualification work ( thesis/ project or bachelor's / master's thesis) - from introduction to applications.
Here you can download the final qualification work template itself:
By completing the sections of this sample template step by step, you will get the job you need. It will then only need to be issued according to the methodological instructions of your university.
For questions, you can go here: Alexander Krylov
So. Structure
TITLE PAGE OF THE FINAL QUALIFICATION WORK
This sheet is from guidelines for the implementation of WRC provided by the university
It is also necessary to look guidelines for the design of text documents, there are:
- Margin sizes (usually the same on all sides - for example, 2 cm each, and the right margin is almost always 1 cm)
- Font size 14, spacing 1.5, the font itself is Times New Roman
- Insert page numbers. Usually they are placed at the bottom in the center, there is no number on the title page
Press Enter before and after each heading so that there is one blank line between the heading and the text before and after it
Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………
Chapter 1. Theoretical review on the topic of WRC ……………………………………………
1.1. Overview of the essence of the selected WRC topic …………………………………………
1.3. Industry-specific features of the WRC topic …………………………………………
Chapter 2. Analysis of the state and activities of the object (enterprise) in terms of the WRC topic in accordance with the methods from clause 1.2 ……………………………………………………
2.1. Brief description and main indicators of the state and activity of the object ……………………………………………………………………………
2.2. Integrated economic or the financial analysis activity of the object ……………………………………………………………………………
2.3. Analysis on the topic of WRC ………………………………………………………………
Chapter 3. Designing measures to improve the activities of the facility in the direction chosen in the WRC ………………………………………………………………
3.1. Conditions and prerequisites for the development of events ………………………….
3.2. Name of event 1 …………………………………………………
3.3. Name of event 2 …………………………………………………
3.4. Name of event 3 ………………………………………………….
3.5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a set of proposed measures ……………
Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………
List of used literature …………………………………………………………
Applications …………………………………………………………………………………
INTRODUCTION
Relevance. Why did you choose this topic? A couple of paragraphs, the total length is approximately 70% of the first page of the introduction
The purpose of the final qualifying work(read more about goals here:)
WRC tasks:
- First task
- Second task
- Usually there are 5-7 pieces
Object of study in the WRC - the legal form and the name of the object of work. For example, Senior Lecturer Alexander Krylov LLC
Subject of study- what comes after the first word "improvement" or "improvement" from the WRC topic. If there is no such word in the title of the topic, then the subject of research is usually the first phrase.
For example, the topic "Improvement financial condition enterprises (on the example of LLC "Diplom 35")"
Then the subject of study in the WRC is the financial condition of the enterprise
Research methods- the methods that you used in the work. Personally, because I am a former senior lecturer in financial management, I write here all the time. financial ratio method. It is reasonable to fill out this paragraph after writing the entire work.
By the way. themselves financial ratios, as well as financial analysis in general, can be calculated for free using this link: http://anfin.ru/finansovyj-analiz-esli-net-dannyh/.
Practical significance of WRC- not available in all jobs. Here we write what a theoretical review of the work can be used for, how you can use the results of the analysis, how realistic it is to use WRC events at the enterprise
Work structure- also not always there is this section. But if there is, then we write here: the final qualifying work consists of an introduction, main part, conclusion, list of sources used and literature and applications. The main part contains a theoretical overview that reveals the topic of the final qualification work, an analytical section that allows you to assess the current state of the object of study, a project part containing a list of measures to improve the subject of research with calculations confirming their economic feasibility
The size of the introduction is 3-5 pages, no more is required.
CHAPTER 1. THEORETICAL REVIEW ON WRC TOPIC
1.1. Overview of the essence of the selected WRC topic
1.2. Methods and approaches to measuring indicators characterizing the theme of the WRC
1.3. Industry specifics of the WRC theme
You can read an article on how to prepare the first part of the final qualification work here:. Where to get the theory - here:
CHAPTER 2. ANALYSIS OF THE STATE AND ACTIVITIES OF THE FACILITY (ENTERPRISE) FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE TOPIC OF WRC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE METHODS FROM P. 1.2
2.1. Brief description and main indicators of the state and activity of the facility
2.2. Comprehensive economic or financial analysis of the facility's activities
In this section, based on the initial data, general analysis enterprises.
Regardless of the topic, the following types of analysis can be carried out:
2.3. Analysis on the subject of the WRC
This section provides specific analysis for topics of work. You have to either invent it yourself, or look for a ready-made one and remake it to suit your theme of work.
CHAPTER 3
3.1. Conditions and prerequisites for the development of events
In this section, we write the conclusions on the analysis from the second chapter, since they are the conditions and prerequisites for the development of measures. Specifically, this section may be located at the end of the second part - there it will be called "Conclusions". Or it can be at the end of the second part, and at the beginning of the third. It depends on what your manager recommends.
You can read about the events for the third part here:. There are many activities, you can invent them yourself. In addition, they can be recommended by your supervisor or a representative of the object of work, that is, for example, the head of a department of an enterprise, who can subsequently write a review of your work ()
3.2. Name of event 1
Here you describe how to implement the first event, what resources are required for it, what are the deadlines for implementation, justify the costs and planned income, describe the possible effect
3.3. Name of event 2
Here you act similarly for the second event
3.4. Name of event 3
Well, here you describe the third event
3.5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a set of proposed measures
Here you describe at least the following indicators - for all events at once:
- One-time costs
— Income
Based on these indicators, consider the indicators of economic efficiency. At least this:
— Profitability of a set of measures
— Change in the efficiency of the WRC facility as a result of the implementation of measures
- Payback period
At the end of this section, you draw conclusions about how the activities you proposed allowed you to achieve the goal of the final qualification work
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, you:
- Draw conclusions to achieve the goal
– Draw conclusions for all chapters, confirming them with figures from the analysis and project
— Describe options for using WRC results
— Describe options for further research for which your WRC can become the basis
LIST OF USED LITERATURE
This is insanity, of course, but often works are sent for rework if the list of more than 30 sources contains more than 5 sources released 5 years ago. It is somehow naive to think that the opinion of a dozen modern analysts who wrote their articles a year ago can even come close to the weight of the opinion of Henry Ford, who was the first to use the assembly line, Jack Trout, who invented the concept of product positioning, or Jack Welch, the legendary CEO of General Electric.
During the two decades of Jack Welch's rule, from 1981 to 2001, the total value of the corporation increased 30 times - from 14 to almost 400 billion dollars. General Electric became the second most profitable company in the world. After his departure from GE in 2001, Welch wrote an autobiography, JACK: Straight From The Gut, which became a bestseller.
And for using such a book and indicating the date of its publication, you can “wrap up” the work. Therefore, adjust the release dates of information sources.
APPS
APPENDIX A
In most economic works, Annex A will be the balance sheet of the object of study for three years.
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX B
The following applications will be located:
— Large illustrations (more than half a page in size)
- Large tables (more than 70% of the page)
All annexes should be mentioned in the text of the WRC.
All applications in the text of the work should be referenced.
The number of applications and their volume is usually not limited.
Materials for final qualifying (diploma, bachelor's, master's), term papers and reports on practice in economics, financial management and analysis:
- The second chapter of the WRC on economics is usually called as part of the title of the thesis, but with the addition of the words "analysis, assessment, diagnostics", etc. to the beginning of the title. For example,…
- Good day, dear reader. In this article I will talk about how to write the introduction of a thesis. The introduction is written after drawing up the plan of the thesis. After writing the introduction...
- The third chapter of the thesis (bachelor's or specialist's) usually consists of three subsections. Its title is often similar to the title of the topic of the diploma and begins with words like ...
- There are several options for where to get the balance sheet and report on financial results for the thesis. Well, for any other economic work, too. If you…
- In order to evaluate the results of the implementation of measures in the third chapter of the diploma, it often makes sense to come up with a forecast balance sheet and a financial results report. What is this for…Good day to you. In this article, we will consider what to write in the conclusion of an economic work - a diploma, a dissertation or a regular term paper. The total volume of the conclusion is about ...
- Here you can read customer reviews about working with me, as well as see the cost of economic theses. Reviews first. Names, as you understand, cannot be given ...
1. The purpose and objectives of the final qualifying work
2. The structure of the final qualifying work
3. Requirements for the submission of the content of the text part of the final qualification work
4. Requirements for the design of the text and graphic parts of the final qualifying work.
Introduction
In accordance with the Federal State Educational Standard in the specialty, the state (final) certification includes the preparation and defense of the final qualifying work.
The implementation of the WRC is one of the main types of independent work of students on final stage training aimed at expanding and consolidating theoretical knowledge, developing skills for solving practical tasks in the course of independent research.
The purpose of the guidelines is to provide assistance to students in the performance of their final qualification work, as well as to teachers who supervise the WRC.
The purpose and objectives of the final qualifying work
1.1. WRC is a final qualifying work containing the results of an independent study on a chosen topic.
1.2. The purpose of the WRC is to determine the degree of readiness of the student to independently solve professional problems.
1.3.In the course of WRC implementation, the following tasks are implemented:
Systematization, expansion and deepening of theoretical and practical knowledge of students in the specialty;
Application of knowledge in the field of economics in solving specific scientific and practical problems;
Mastering the methodology and methodology of scientific research;
Development of skills and abilities of independent work.
The structure of the final qualifying work
The WRC should contain the following structural elements: title page, assignment for the WRC, abstract, content, introduction, main body, conclusion, list of sources used, annexes, supervisor's review (not filed), review (not filed).
The title page is the first page of the WRC, serves as a source of information necessary for the processing and search of the WRC, and should include:
Indication of the departmental affiliation of the technical school;
Full name of the college;
A mark on the admission of the WRC to the defense;
Name of the WRC topic;
Name and code of the specialty;
Surname, name, patronymic and signature of the student who completed it;
Surname, initials and signature of the head;
Surname, initials and signature of the controller;
Place and year of WRC.
A sample title page is shown in Appendix A.
Task for WRC is normative document, establishing the boundaries and depth of the development of the topic, as well as the deadlines for the provision of work.
The task for the WRC is drawn up on a standard form (Appendix B) is signed by the student, supervisor and approved by the chairman
abstract is compiled in a short form (no more than 1 page) and should include information about the volume of the WRC, the number of illustrations, tables, applications, a list of keywords, annotation.
The list of keywords should include from 5 to 15 words or phrases from the text of the WRC, which characterize its content to the greatest extent and provide the possibility of information retrieval. Keywords are given in the nominative case and are printed in capital letters in a line separated by commas.
The abstract reflects the structure of the WRC, its object, subject, purpose and objectives, the degree of development of the topic, methods, means, methods and ways of research, their novelty and proposals for the implementation of the results, indicating their area of application, the significance of the work, the forecast for the development of the research object.
If the WRC does not contain information on any of the listed structural parts of the abstract, then it is omitted in the text of the abstract, but the sequence of presentation is preserved.
The heading "SUMMARY" is placed with a paragraph indent and is done in capital letters.
A sample abstract is given in Appendix B.
Chapters, paragraphs, subparagraphs should have serial numbers within the main part and be indicated by Arabic numerals with a dot at the end.
Introduction, list of references and applications are not numbered.
The words "chapter", "paragraph", "subparagraph" before the heading are not written.
Paragraphs should be numbered sequentially within each chapter. The paragraph number includes the chapter number and the serial number of the paragraph, separated by a dot. For example: 1.1., 1.2., 1.3. etc.
The subparagraph number includes the chapter number, paragraph number and subparagraph serial number, separated by a dot. For example: 1.1.1., 1.1.2., 1.1.3. etc.
Headings of chapters, paragraphs, subparagraphs are written with a paragraph indent without a dot at the end and without underlining. Headings of chapters - in capital letters, paragraphs, subparagraphs - with capital letters. It is allowed to highlight the headings of chapters and paragraphs of the WRC in bold type.
The distance between the title and the text should be at least 2-3 intervals.
Transfer of long headings is carried out without breaking into syllables (by words). If the headings include several sentences, then they are separated by dots.
In the introduction necessary:
Show the relevance of the WRC topic: the state of its theoretical development, unexplored aspects of the problem under study, difficulties and contradictions in practice, from which the need to study this topic follows.
To substantiate the relevance of the WRC topic, it is possible to characterize the regulatory materials that contain decisions confirming the importance of the topic and expressing the needs formed at the level of the state and economic authorities, as well as a description of the practice, its state and needs, confirming the importance of the topic, analysis of theoretical works - the contribution of scientists to the development of the topic and description of the prerequisites created in science for the development of the topic; compare theoretical developments and their practical application to identify inconsistencies; describe the expected impact of research on the topic on the development of science and practice;
Describe the subject and object of research. The object of research, as a rule, follows from the formulation of the topic and characterizes the boundaries of the study. Subject of study - economic relations, properties and functions identified in the object of study;
Formulate the main goal of the WRC as the expected result of the study, which can be expressed in the identification of new results in the development of theory, in positive changes in practice. The goal statement includes:
The target action that needs to be performed on the subject of research within the framework of the object: develop, justify, identify, disclose, provide, analyze, etc.;
Target subject as part of the goal of the study: ways and means, directions, requirements, aspects, etc.;
The target object as part of the theory and practice, within which the goal is realized: economic system, development process, real economic ties, models of the economic mechanism, economic processes, methods, etc.;
Identify the main tasks that need to be solved to achieve the goal.
These tasks are connected, firstly, with the study of the theory of the issue (give a justification, study the state of the problem, reveal the essence, determine methodological approaches, etc.);
secondly, with the study of the state of practice and the manifestation of the subject of research (to characterize the content and methods, analyze the current practice and assess the degree of implementation of theoretical developments, determine the role and place of use, as well as familiarize yourself, establish, identify, trace, etc. );
thirdly, with the transformation of the subject of research (to develop a system, improve, systematize, classify, generalize, identify, prepare, create, formulate, determine the content, model the system); fourthly, with the development of recommendations (develop proposals, draw up recommendations, develop activities, a program, etc.);
Indicate the initial methodological principles that determine the approach to the study of the topic;
List the methods of collecting and processing information, evaluating the results obtained, used in the process of performing the WRC;
To characterize the information base of the study (literature sources, normative and legislative acts, instructional materials, materials of periodicals, statistical data, etc.);
Justify the practical significance of the chosen topic.
The heading "INTRODUCTION" is placed with a paragraph indent and is done in capital letters.
The main part of the WRC contains a presentation of the material that reveals the implementation of the research goal and the solution of the theoretical and practical problems outlined in the introduction:
The structure of the main part may be different. Recommended: two to three sections (chapters) with two to three subsections (paragraphs) or three to four sections (chapters) without subsections (paragraphs). All parts of the work (sections, subsections) should be approximately equal in volume.
The tasks set should be disclosed in equal detail and in detail.
At the end of each section (subsection), a conclusion should be drawn and a logical transition to the next section (subsection) should be outlined.
In the first section (chapter) of the main part of the WRC, the theoretical foundations of the research topic are considered, using a systematic approach, comparative analysis and other general scientific economic methods.
A literature review on the problem under development is obligatory. It is the result of analytical and synthetic processing literary sources on a specific topic, containing generalized and critically analyzed information about the history, current state, trends and prospects for the development of the subject of the review.
In the second section (chapter) of the WRC, a critical analysis of the current state of affairs on the problem under consideration is carried out in the context of practical activities. The purpose of this analysis is to identify both positive and negative aspects state of the issue under study and search possible solutions(improvement, improvement, development), or finding fundamentally new approaches. It is necessary, in addition to stating the facts, to give them a qualified assessment and develop recommendations for solving the problem.
The degree of elaboration of solutions is agreed with the head. Each recommendation (solution) must be fully disclosed and justified.
The text part of the theoretical and practical sections should be supplemented with tables, figures, graphs, references to literature, etc.
All chapters and paragraphs are arranged in the order indicated in the TABLE OF CONTENTS and should be logically interconnected, ensuring consistent development of the main ideas of the topic throughout the WRC.
The distance between chapter headings and its text should be 2 spaces. The distance between the paragraph heading and its text should be one spacing.
On the page where the heading of a paragraph or subparagraph is given, there must be at least two lines of subsequent text.
AT imprisonment the significance of the considered issues for theory and practice is revealed, the main results of the work done are summed up, the completeness and depth of the solution of the issues raised in the WRC are assessed, proposals and recommendations for the implementation of the results obtained are presented, prospects are determined further study Problems. In the Conclusion, repetition of the content of the introduction or the main part is not allowed.
The heading "CONCLUSION" is placed with a paragraph indent and is in capital letters.
List of sources used is built in accordance with the rules established for bibliographic descriptions.
The main requirements for the list of sources used:
Compliance with the theme of the WRC and the completeness of the reflection of all its aspects;
A variety of types of publications: official, regulatory, reference, educational, scientific, industrial and practical, etc.;
Absence of obsolete documents.
The sources used are indicated in the following sequence (Appendix I).
Within the section of normative legal acts, instructive and administrative and other official documents, sources of equal legal force are arranged in chronological order according to the dates of their adoption and signing.
Inside the section of literary sources, the names of authors and titles of works (if the author is not indicated) are placed strictly alphabetically. Foreign sources should be placed at the end of the list of all materials. When compiling an alphabetical list, the following sequence of sources is followed: if the first words match, the second words are alphabetized, etc.; with several works of one author - alphabetically by titles, with authors with namesakes - by identification features (younger, eldest, father, son - from older to younger), with several works of the author written in collaboration with others - alphabetically by the authors' surnames.
When making a list, all the basic information about the publication is indicated: the surname and initials of the author (authors), title, place, year of publication, number of pages.
All sources used are numbered in Arabic numerals with a dot and are printed with a paragraph indent.
The heading "LIST OF USED SOURCES" is placed with a paragraph indent and is in capital letters.
An example of the list of used sources is given in Appendix I.
Archival materials used in the implementation of the WRC are indicated in the list of sources used after the regulatory and reference acts.
Applications designed to facilitate the perception of the content of the work.
They should include:
Ancillary materials that clutter up the main text;
Materials supplementing the text;
Intermediate formulas and calculations;
Auxiliary data tables;
Auxiliary illustrations, instructions, questionnaires, methods, etc.
Application rules:
Applications are placed at the end of the WRC;
Each application must begin on a new page with the word "APPENDIX" at the top in the middle of the page, indicating its designation without a dot at the end and the thematic heading, which is written down in the middle of the page;
Applications (if there are more than one) are numbered (designated) with capital letters of the Russian alphabet, starting with A, with the exception of the letters Ё, Z, Y, O, Ch, b, Y, b, and are arranged in the order in which they are referenced in the main text . It is allowed to designate applications with Latin letters, with the exception of J and O. In the case of full use of the letters of the Russian and Latin alphabets, it is allowed to designate applications with Arabic numerals. If the application consists of several parts, then a combination of alphabetic and numeric designations is allowed. For example, for Appendix A: A.1., A.1.1., A.1.1.1, etc.;
Annexes should share pagination with the rest of the WRC;
The review of the head is made in free form, but it must reflect:
Compliance of the content of the WRC with the task;
Description of the work done in all its sections;
The completeness of the disclosure of the topic;
Theoretical level and practical significance of the work;
The degree of independence and creative initiative of the graduate student, his business qualities;
Quality of work design;
The possibility of admitting a student to the public defense of the WRC in the SAC,
A sample of the execution of the review of the head is given in Appendix K.
Review is the most important document, which determines the completeness and quality of the WRC submitted for defense.
The review is made in free form, but it must include an assessment of:
Compliance of the content of the WRC with its topic;
Relevance and social significance Topics;
The main results of the WRC, including novelty: new ideas, original research methods, new approaches;
Practical significance and the possibility of implementing the results of the WRC into practice, the expected effect;
Validity of conclusions and proposals;
Existing shortcomings of the WQR (in terms of content, presentation and design of materials), as well as questions for the student and the recommended overall grade of the WQR. An example of a review is given in Appendix L.
INTRODUCTION
The final qualifying work is research work scientific content, which has internal unity and reflects the course and results of the development of the chosen topic. It should be relevant and correspond to the modern level of scientific and technological development. The final qualifying work is presented in a form that allows one to judge how fully the provisions, conclusions and recommendations contained in it, their novelty and significance are reflected and justified. The totality of the results obtained in the work should indicate that students have initial skills scientific work in the chosen area professional activity.
The main task of the author is to demonstrate the level of his scientific qualifications and, above all, the ability to independently conduct scientific research and solve specific scientific problems. The final qualifying work consolidates the information received in the form of textual and demonstration material, in which the author organizes the accumulated facts at his own discretion and proves the scientific value or practical significance of certain provisions, not relying on authority, tradition or faith, but by consciously convincing them of their truth on the basis of norms and criteria significant for the scientific community.
The originality, uniqueness and uniqueness of the information provided characterize the content of the course work. The content of the course work in the most systematized form captures both the initial prerequisites for scientific research, and its course and the results obtained. At the same time, scientific facts are not simply described, but they are carried out. comprehensive analysis, typical situations are considered, the available alternatives and the reasons for choosing one of them are discussed.
“split” it into sub-questions, without answers to which it is impossible to get an answer to the main problematic question;
group and determine the sequence of solving the sub-questions that make up the problem;
limit the field of study in accordance with the need for research and the capabilities of the researcher himself, and then distinguish between the known and the unknown in the area chosen for study.
find out all the conditions necessary to solve the problem, including methods, means, techniques, techniques, etc.;
check available opportunities and prerequisites;
find out the degree of problematic, i.e. the ratio of the known and the unknown in the information that needs to be used to solve the problem;
find among the already solved problems similar to the one being solved.
to establish the value, content and genetic links of this problem with other problems;
give arguments in favor of the reality of the problem, its formulation and solution;
try to put forward an arbitrarily large number of objections to the problem.
Target is what is in the general view should be achieved as a result of work on the WRC. This is the scientific result that must be obtained in the end of the whole research.
The formulation of the research goal begins with the verb - to study, investigate, identify, establish, develop, etc. ...", "analyze and generalize the experience ... determine its significance for development...", "identify the possibilities of applying ... experience in domestic ... science", etc.
The inaccuracy of the formulation of the research goal arises when students replace the definition of a scientific result (which should be the main result of the WRC) with practical goals, i.e. when a scientific goal is replaced by a practical one. For example, “improving the efficiency of the management process ....”, “improving the quality of management ...”, etc. - these are not the goals of the WRC. Scientific results in the future, of course, with certain conditions(introduction into production) can become the basis for "increasing the efficiency of the process ..." and "improving the quality ...", but they cannot be set as the goal of the course work. And even such a wording as “to develop evidence-based recommendations” can only act as an accompanying, auxiliary, but not as the main goal of the study, but rather as one of the tasks that contribute to increasing the practical significance of the course work.
An object is a process or phenomenon that generates a problem situation and is chosen for study. Object Formulation - milestone scientific research, since the wrong choice of object can lead to gross methodological errors. If the object of the WRC is not clearly established, then it is very easy to "slip" to the study of the object of another science. The object must always be in the field of the science within which the work is being written.
After the object is formulated subject research is the part of the object that is subjected to scientific research. In one object, several subjects can be identified, which will subsequently be studied in different studies or even scientific directions. When formulating the subject, it must be remembered that it must coincide with the topic of the work.
The object and subject of research are related to each other as general and particular. In the object, that part of it, which is the subject of research, is allocated. It is on him that the main attention of the student is directed, the subject of the study determines the topic of the work, which is indicated on the title page.
After formulating the goal, object and subject of work, a hypothesis, aimed at proving the real existence of the alleged. Forming a hypothesis, the student builds an assumption about how he intends to achieve the goal. Working on the WRC, he constantly poses questions: in which direction to move, what needs to be done, what needs to be changed and how to do it, i.e. each time he puts forward certain assumptions, confirming or refuting them. Thus, the student constantly works with a whole system of hypotheses, but does not formulate them in writing.
A scientific assumption encourages an active, purposeful study of various phenomena in order to discover evidence that confirms or refutes it. Scientific search, if it is controlled by a hypothesis, ceases to be amorphous, acquires an internal structure and therefore becomes much more effective.
A hypothesis should be distinguished from a guess, since the first is based on extensive factual material, and the second is formulated without sufficient grounds. The hypothesis in the process of its development goes through the following stages:
the accumulation of factual material and the statement on its basis of an assumption;
formulation of the hypothesis, i.e. highlighting the consequences of the assumption made, deploying on its basis a whole conjectural theory;
verification of the findings in practice and refinement of the hypothesis based on the results of such verification.
identify a group of phenomena, the reason for the existence of which cannot yet be explained using the available methods and means of scientific research;
study in detail the available set of phenomena, the cause of which must be found, in the process of this study, all the circumstances associated with this phenomenon are revealed;
formulate a scientific assumption (hypothesis) about possible reason, which caused the occurrence of this phenomenon;
determine one or more consequences that logically follow from the alleged cause, as if the cause had actually been found;
check how these consequences correspond to the facts of reality; when the highlighted consequences correspond to real facts, the hypothesis is recognized as solid.
The formulated goal and hypothesis of the study logically define it. tasks, which represent the stages of goal realization and hypothesis testing. The formulation of tasks begins with a verb, for example: 1) study ..., 2) identify ..., 3) develop ..., 4) check ..., etc.
The tasks should contain the stages of work on the theoretical and empirical parts of the WRC. The enumeration of tasks can be determined both by the temporal sequence of their implementation, and by the logical sequence determined by the internal logic of the research process.
The wording of the tasks must be accurate, since the description of their solution is the content of the chapters of the course work. The wording of the tasks determines the titles of the chapters and paragraphs of the work.
All the tasks stated in the work must be carried out, according to the results of solving the problems, it is necessary to formulate conclusions.
Any scientific research involves the disclosure of its methodological foundations, i.e. concepts and theories underlying it. It is necessary to indicate the methodological base, since it is this section of the introduction that shows the level of the student's methodological preparation.
The need to indicate the methodological foundations of the work is also dictated by ethical considerations. AT modern science there cannot be pioneers who do their work "with clean slate". Each researcher always builds his research on the basis of an analysis of the work of scientists who have studied this problem before him.
In addition, the need to indicate the methodological foundations is also due to the fact that in psychology there are many scientific schools that develop the same problems, but from different positions, in different directions. AT scientific schools can be formulated directly opposite points of view to the study and interpretation of the same issue. Therefore, a student building own work, must take a strictly defined position - which theories, concepts he takes as basic and justifies why, and which works he only refers to in the course of the analysis scientific sources.
Speaking about the methodological basis of the study, it is necessary to indicate and research approach(s) as some initial principles, positions on the basis of which the work is built.
In psychology, there are a large number of scientific approaches to the study of phenomena and facts. Since the mid-50s. 20th century the most common is the system approach, which is a system-structural analysis of internal relations in an object, considering any object as a holistic formation, consisting of elements that are closely interconnected and transform into each other in the process of interaction.
System-structural analysis as a method is very fruitful, but it is only one of the many methods of scientific knowledge. Also prove consistency own research it can be quite difficult for a student, so you can use integrated approach to the study of phenomena, bearing in mind that a complex is a collection of objects and phenomena that make up one whole. Also, WRC work can be built within the framework of a holistic approach, in which the whole is determined by the unification of parts into complex complexes with the mutual influence of parts.
AT methods research, the names of theoretical, empirical, and mathematical-statistical, interpretive methods used in the study are indicated.
When characterizing methodologies studies, their full and exact name, accepted in science, the authors of the methodology (authors of adaptation, modification) are indicated, and the numbers of scientific sources from the list of references from which these methods were taken are indicated in square brackets.
In the paragraph devoted to the description of diagnostic tools, a complete and clear rationale for the choice of research methods should be given.
Competences of a university graduate as a cumulative expected result upon completion of training in the profile "Management of an organization":
Possession of a culture of thinking, the ability to perceive, generalize and analyze information, set a goal and choose ways to achieve it (OK-5),
the ability to logically correctly, reasonably and clearly build oral and written speech (OK-6),
the ability to analyze socially significant processes and phenomena (OK-13),
ability to design organizational structure, carry out the distribution of powers and responsibilities on the basis of their delegation (PC-2),
the ability to effectively organize group work based on knowledge of the processes of group dynamics and the principles of team formation (PC-5),
the ability to assess the conditions and consequences of organizational and managerial decisions (PC-8),
· own project management methods and readiness for their implementation using modern software(PK-20),
ability to economic way of thinking (PC-26),
ability to analyze financial statements and make informed investment, credit and financial decisions (PC-40),
ability to assess investment projects under various conditions of investment and financing (PC-43),
the ability to find and evaluate new market opportunities and formulate a business idea (PC-48),
· the ability to find and evaluate new market opportunities and formulate a business idea (PC-49).
Selection and approval of the topic of the WRC
The choice of the topic of bachelor's work is determined by:
The level of knowledge of the student in the main disciplines of the curriculum,
Place of work (base industrial practice) graduate,
Scientific interests of the graduate,
The practical orientation of the WRC.
The topics of the WRC should be relevant, correspond to the current state and prospects for the development of the organization (enterprise).
In addition, the topic of the WRC may be of a research nature.
With this in mind, the topic of bachelor's work is determined by the student independently, while it is necessary to take into account the possibility of obtaining specific statistical data on the object of the graduate work, as well as the availability of special scientific and educational literature on the problems considered in the work.
The main criterion for a graduate to choose a topic for a WRC should be the research interest of the student, as well as the interest of the administration of the enterprise (institution, organization), on the example of which the study is being conducted. If the student clearly understands on what topic he can find the most complete and meaningful material, then with other equal conditions It is this circumstance that may determine the choice of topic.
Approximate topics of graduation bachelor's theses are presented in Appendix A.
Using the right of choice, the student can propose “his own” topic of the WRC, provided that the rationale for its development is justified. For a graduate who did not use the right to choose, the topic of the WRC is assigned at the suggestion of the head.
The choice of the topic of the bachelor's work and its approval must be completed before the end of the work experience.
Assignment for students of the topic of the WRC on his written application and on the proposal of the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems is formalized by order of the Rector of the University.
At the same time, by order of the rector, supervisors of bachelor's works from among professors and associate professors, experienced teachers and researchers of the university are appointed. In addition, leaders can researchers and highly qualified specialists of other institutions, organizations and enterprises.
WRC leadership
The supervisor is appointed in order to provide the student with theoretical and practical assistance during the preparation and writing of the WRC.
Supervisor:
assists the student in choosing a topic,
gives the task to the student, makes a plan with him,
assists in the choice of methods for conducting analysis and research,
gives qualified advice on the selection of the necessary scientific and educational literature, reference and statistical materials and other sources on the chosen topic,
conducts consultations as necessary,
carries out systematic control over the preparation of bachelor's work,
checks its readiness.
At various stages of the preparation and implementation of the WRC, the tasks of the leader change.
At the first stage, the leader advises how to start considering the topic, corrects the work plan and makes recommendations on the list of references.
During the implementation of the WRC, the leader acts as an opponent, points out to the student the shortcomings of the argumentation, composition, style, etc., gives advice on how to eliminate them.
The student should perceive the recommendations and comments of the supervisor creatively. He can take them into account or reject them at his own discretion, since the responsibility for the theoretically and methodically correct development and coverage of the topic, the quality of the content and design of the WRC lies entirely with the student - the author of the work.
At the suggestion of the head, if necessary, the graduating department provides the right to invite consultants for individual sections of the work at the expense of the time allotted for the management of the WRC. Professors and researchers of the university or other enterprises and organizations may be appointed as consultants. The consultant checks the relevant part of the student's work and puts his signature on it.
The student - the author of the work - is responsible for the decisions made in the WRC and for the correctness of all the given data.
The completed bachelor's thesis, signed by the student and, if necessary, by the consultant, is transferred to the supervisor.
After reviewing and approving the work, the supervisor gives feedback. The review should describe the work done by the student on the preparation of the WRC for each of its sections. The review provides a comprehensive description of the quality of bachelor's work, notes positive sides, Special attention refers to the previously noted shortcomings that have not been eliminated by the student, motivates the possibility or inappropriateness of submitting a diploma to the SAC. In the review, the leader also notes the rhythm of the work, the conscientiousness and independence of the student, his activity and creativity.
Then the WRC is submitted for normative control. In order to bring the work in line with the "Requirements for Regulatory Control", you must use guidelines, which are posted on the website of the branch www.udgutura.ru in the section "Methodological materials".
Having received the mark and signature of the normative controller, the student, together with the written review of the head, submits the WRC to the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems, where, based on the materials submitted, the issue of admitting the student to the defense is decided. At the same time, a corresponding entry is made on the title page of the work.
If a decision is made on the impossibility of admitting a student to the defense, an appropriate protocol is drawn up, which is submitted for approval to the rector of the university.
A bachelor's thesis admitted for defense is sent for review.
WRC review
To obtain an additional objective assessment of the student's work, an external review of the bachelor's work is carried out by specialists in the relevant field.
Experts and heads of state, regional and local authorities, enterprises, institutions, organizations of related industries can be involved as reviewers. Availability higher education the reviewer is required. Also, professors and teachers of other universities can be involved as reviewers.
The reviewer is obliged to conduct a qualified analysis of the essence and main provisions of the reviewed work and reflect in the review:
The relevance of the chosen topic; - independence of the approach to its disclosure; - the presence of one's own point of view; - the ability to use the methods of scientific research; - the logic of constructing the work and presentation of the material; - the degree of validity of the conclusions and recommendations; - the reliability of the results and their practical significance; - specific comments on the content, conclusions, recommendations and design of the work, indicating sections and pages; - recommendations for evaluating the WRC on a four-point system (“excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory”, “unsatisfactory”). The review is written or printed in any form, recommended the volume of the text is 1-1.5 pages. The review indicates the full name. reviewer, his academic degree, academic title, place of work, position. The reviewer signs the review and puts down the date of its writing. The signature of the reviewer must be certified by the seal of the organization in which he works. The review is not filed with the work, but is attached to it. The WRC with a review, the review of the head must be submitted to the department no later than 7 days before the start of the work of the SAC on protection. Changes to the final qualifying work after receiving the review are not allowed.
At the defense of the WRC in the SAC, it is advisable to additionally provide a review of the organization on whose order the work was performed. It should indicate the practical value of the results obtained and the stage of their implementation.
On the eve of the defense, the Chairman of the SAC gets acquainted with the content of the WRC, reviews of leaders and reviews.
WRC protection
The student, having received a positive feedback from the supervisor, a review by an external reviewer and the decision of the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems on admission to protection, must prepare a report for 4-5 minutes, in which he must clearly and briefly state the main provisions of the work. At the same time, it should be taken into account that usually the basis for the preparation of a report (statement) is the conclusion of the WRC.
For clarity, it is necessary to prepare illustrative material of at least 5 pages with graphs, tables, diagrams (for each member of the commission), which allow concretizing the main provisions of the report.
The report itself and illustrations to it (handout) must be agreed with the head of the WRC.
The report should:
indicate the relevance of the topic of work,
list the issues and problems of the functioning of the WRC object, identified in the process of its implementation,
justify the choice management decision and prove its effectiveness.
The success of the defense largely depends on the quality of the report, so the issue of its preparation is very serious.
The defense is held at a meeting of the State Examination Commission. It consists of highly qualified university teachers, and in some cases - specialists from enterprises and organizations. The composition of the commission is approved by the order of the rector of the university.
The committee meeting may be attended by WRC leaders, reviewers, as well as students and interested persons.
The order of defense is as follows: first, the student makes a report, then the supervisor's review and review are read out, after which the student responds to the comments made in the review and review.
For each WRC, the commission asks questions. In addition, questions to the student can be asked by the supervisor, the reviewer and all those present. It should be borne in mind that the answers to the questions should be short, clear and convincing. The score for the WRC is set by the commission at the end of the working session. At the same time, the issue of assigning the appropriate qualification to successfully defended students is being resolved. Also, the commission on a number of works can express a dissenting opinion - recommend for implementation, recommend the author for admission to the magistracy, recommend preparing an article based on the project materials, etc.
The decision of the GEC is final. 2. WRC structure
Introduction- this is the introductory part of the WRC, in which the theoretical and practical relevance of the chosen topic is substantiated, the object of the work is determined, its goal and objectives are formulated, and a brief annotation of the main sections is given. The volume of the introduction is up to 3 pages.
Main part The WRC includes several sections (chapters), the number of which depends on the chosen topic and is determined by the student in agreement with the supervisor. It is recommended to form 3 chapters in the main part of the work.
To the first chapter it is advisable to include consideration of the following issues
General organization characteristic,
The staff of the organization and the effectiveness of its use,
External environment (suppliers, customers, competitors) and marketing in the organization,
Analysis of the dynamics of the main economic indicators activities for 2 years.
Giving general characteristics organization, it is appropriate to state a brief history its formation and development, formulate the goals and objectives of the activity, give brief description products (works, services).
Considering the issue of managing an organization, it is necessary to characterize the organizational structure, highlighting the units managerial level, the main production divisions, auxiliary divisions, and also to characterize the relationship of divisions in the organization.
One of the essential characteristics of an organization is its dependence on external environment. In this regard, it is necessary to present the actual external environment and consider its impact on the activities of the organization. It is important to identify the most important factors external influence and effective ways response to them.
In the second chapter necessary:
Identify key issues in organization activities,
Of all the problems, select 1, maximum 2, the most relevant for the organization,
Consider theoretical questions on the topic of WRC,
Develop options for solving a given problem
Conduct an analysis of the proposed options,
To carry out the choice of the most acceptable variant of the managerial solution of the problem posed.
The development of options for solving the problem consists in the formation of 2 or more management decisions.
The formation of management decision options should be accompanied by a theoretical study of the relevant issues. At the same time, it is necessary to assess the degree of knowledge of the problem (problems) posed, consider debatable issues, and analyze domestic and foreign experience. Consideration of theoretical issues on the topic of the work involves the study of about 10 literary sources, which should include monographs of the most authoritative experts on the research problem, articles in scientific journals, Internet publications. References to sources in the text of the work are required. Based on the analysis, the own point of view of the author of the final work should be formed, the most important points for the development of the chosen area are listed, taking into account which managerial solutions to the problem will be formed.
When identifying the main problems of activity in the functional areas of management (production, marketing, infrastructure, etc.), it is advisable to conduct a SWOT - analysis, build a "problem tree".
In the third chapter the choice and justification of the management decision is carried out.
Each solution option proposed in the second chapter should contain
Description of the essence of the proposed solution,
Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the design solution for the possible results and required costs of all types of resources (material, labor, financial, etc.),
Description of sources resource formation,
Analysis of strengths and weaknesses design solution,
Characteristics of the risks of design decisions,
Duration project implementation,
Spend economic justification project (management decision).
On this basis, the choice of a management decision is carried out - a project aimed at solving the problem (problems) posed. The main thing: there must be clear evidence to support the decision.
After the choice of the final decision is made, it is necessary to propose a plan for the implementation of the project.
Conclusion should contain the main conclusions obtained during the implementation of the WRC. It is advisable to include in this section brief conclusions based on the results of the analysis of the organization's activities, the main problems of the organization's management, a brief description of the proposed management decision and the results of calculations for its economic justification.
Bibliography is an integral part of the final work and shows the degree of study of the problem, includes sources that the author used when studying the topic and writing the work, and is drawn up in accordance with the requirements of GOST 7.1.
AT applications materials are removed that facilitate the perception of the main part without overloading it. Appendixes contribute to a wider coverage of the topic, however, the main text of the work should be created in such a way that it is self-sufficient and contains a small number of applications. In terms of content and form, applications can be very different: copies of documents, excerpts from reporting materials, tables, graphs, diagrams, etc. The main test of the work should contain links to all cited applications.
APPENDIX A
Options for graduation thesis topics
1. Comprehensive assessment current state and development prospects.
2. Organizational and economic aspects of improving corporate governance.
3. Improving the management structure in the organization.
4. Development of a strategic management project in the organization.
5. Project development operational management In the organisation.
6. Improving the quality management system in the organization.
7. Improving the cost management system in the organization.
8. Business plan and its role in improving management.
9. Ways to improve the efficiency and quality of management.
10. Strategic Analysis the external environment of the enterprise.
11. Resource management and evaluation of the effectiveness of their use.
12. Analysis of crisis trends in the organization's activities.
13. Designing the diversification of the organization's activities.
14. Ways to strengthen the financial condition of the organization.
15. Improving the management of the organization's working capital.
16. Improving the mechanism for the formation, distribution and use of profits.
17. Risk management in the organization.
18. Development of the innovative potential of the organization.
19. Improvement of investment activity in the organization.
20. Development and economic justification of the investment project.
21. Organization and improvement of marketing in the corporate management system.
22. Study of pricing factors for products and services.
23. Research needs, supply and demand for goods and services.
24. Forecasting demand for goods and services.
25. Organization and development of Internet marketing in the organization.
26. Ways to improve the competitiveness of the organization.
27. Strategy and tactics of personnel management.
28. Improving the efficiency of managerial work in the organization.
29. Analysis and design of the motivation system in the organization.
30. Development logistics system supply and distribution in the organization.
31. Development and economic justification of the organizational project for the creation of a small business.
32. Development and economic justification of an entrepreneurial project.
33. Improvement information support control systems.
34. Improving the foreign economic activity of the organization.
35. Formation of corporate culture in the organization.
36. Analysis and design of communications in the organization.
APPENDIX B
"Improving the cost management system in the organization"
Introduction
1.3. Managment structure.
1.4. Personnel and its use.
1.6. Dynamics of the main economic indicators.
Chapter 2. Problems of cost management and ways to solve them
2.1. Cost analysis in the organization
2.2. Theoretical issues of determining factors and reserves for cost reduction
2.3. Identification of the main problems of cost reduction in the organization and building a "problem tree".
2.4. Development of options for management decisions to reduce costs.
Chapter 3. Selection and justification of the decision (project) to reduce costs in the organization.
3.4. Selection of a management decision (project) and assessment of the possibility of cost reduction.
3.5. Project Implementation Plan.
Conclusion
Bibliography
Applications
"Ways to strengthen the financial condition of the organization"
Introduction
Chapter 1. Current state organizations.
1.1. History of creation and development, organizational and legal form, goals and activities.
1.2. Characteristics of manufactured products (work performed, services rendered).
1.3. Managment structure.
1.4. Personnel and wages.
1.5. External environment and marketing in the organization.
1.6. Dynamics of the main economic indicators
Chapter 2. Problems of strengthening the financial condition and ways to solve them
2.1. Analysis of the financial condition.
2.2. Theoretical issues of determining directions for strengthening the financial condition
2.3. Identification of the main problems of strengthening the financial condition in the organization and building a "tree of problems".
2.4. Development of options for management decisions to strengthen the financial condition.
Chapter 3. Selection and justification of a decision (project) to strengthen the financial condition.
3.1. Calculation of the need for resources to implement the proposed solutions.
3.2. Sources of formation of resources for the implementation of solutions.
3.3. Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed solutions.
3.4. The choice of a management decision (project) and the possibility of improving the financial condition.
3.5. Project implementation plan.
Conclusion
Bibliography
Applications
Similar information.
Graduation of the final work consists of several indicators:
The quality of the work (the level of disclosure of the topic, theoretical and practical significance, design, etc.);
The quality of the speech (the ability to focus on the main provisions of the study, the depth and completeness of answers to questions, orientation in the material).
When evaluating the quality of work, the reviewer's assessment and the supervisor's review are taken into account.
The results of the defense of the WRC are evaluated at a closed meeting of the SEC at the end of the defense with the marks "excellent", "good", "satisfactory" and "unsatisfactory" by a simple majority of votes of the members of the commission participating in the meeting. In case of an equal number of votes, the chairman's vote is decisive. Estimates are announced on the same day after the execution of the minutes of the SEC meeting.
A student who has received an “unsatisfactory” grade during the defense of the WRC is issued an academic certificate.
When making an assessment for the WQR, the supervisor, reviewer, state examination committee may be guided by the following criteria:
Rating "excellent"
1) A clear, logical research program has been developed.
2) The relevance and novelty of the chosen topic are convincingly substantiated.
3) Dan analytical review scientific literature, researched scientific and methodological, documentary and other sources. The main theoretical concepts and ideas are developed clearly, clearly, reliably.
4) The ability to evaluate different points of view on the essence of the problem under study is shown, an analysis of advanced pedagogical experience is given and scientific independence, one's own research position is shown.
5) Hypothesis and research tasks are correctly formulated, adequate methods are chosen.
6) Detailed and carefully processed experimental material, given a variety of illustrated conclusions throughout the work, summarized the data of theoretical and practical research, proposed reasonable guidelines, ways of further study of the problem are outlined.
7) The work is correctly and competently framed.
8) The performance of the graduate during the defense is built logically and consistently.
9) The student's answers to the questions of the members of the commission are given complete, accurate.
8) Research materials are presented at a conference, seminar, school, etc.
Rated "good"
The work is rated "good" if the above requirements are met, but there are minor shortcomings:
1) The material is presented insufficiently convincingly.
2) Few examples are given.
3) There are errors in the design of the work.
4) The list of used literature is insufficient (less than 30 sources), etc.
Grade "satisfactory"
Exhibited in the event that the basic requirements for student research papers are met, but it does not give the impression of a clearly planned, complete and completed study, and also if serious errors are made or there are significant shortcomings in the design of the work that prevent an adequate assessment of the work done, and/or the results obtained. The “satisfactory” rating also evaluates the work of a descriptive nature.
Grade "unsatisfactory"
It can be put up if the requirements for the WRC are not met (an analysis of the literature on the research topic, modern theoretical concepts is not presented, research methods do not correspond to the purpose and objectives of the work, etc.).
LIST OF USED SOURCES
1. Federal state educational standard middle vocational education specialty 050146 Teaching in primary school: approved November 5, 2009 No. 535- Moscow, 2009.- 44 p.
2. Federal state educational standard of secondary vocational education in the specialty 050715 Correctional Pedagogy in primary education: approved on October 12, 2009 No. 583.- Moscow, 2009.- 46 p.
3. GOST 7.1 - 2003. Bibliographic record. Bibliographic description of the document. General requirements and rules for compilation.
4. GOST 7.80 - 2000. Bibliographic record. Title. General requirements and rules for compilation.
5. GOST 7.32 - 2001. Research report. Structure and rules of registration.
6. Regulations on graduation qualifying work in GAPOU TO: approved on November 6, 2014 No. 301.
7. Berezhnova, E.V. et al. Fundamentals of educational and research activities of students / E.V. Berezhnova, V.V. Kraevsky. - Moscow: Academy, 2013. - 128s.
8. Zagvyazinsky V.I. and other Methodology and methods of psychological and pedagogical research / V.I. Zagvyazinsky, R. Atakhanov. - Moscow: Academy, 2010. - 208s.
ATTACHMENT 1
Application form
GAPOU TO
To the Chairman of the P(C)K
____________________________________
student(s) _________ course, specialty _______________________ ____________________________________ _____________________________ (full name)
"_____" ___________________ 20 ___
STATEMENT
Please assign me the topic of the qualification work: _________________________
I ask you to appoint the head of the qualification work: _______________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Supervisor's signature ___________________ Student's signature _____________________
"______" ________________ 20___ "______" ____________________ 20___
Decision P(C)K_______________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Minutes No. ______ dated "____" ___________________ 20__
APPENDIX 2
Task for WRC
Tyumen region
"TYUMEN PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGE"
APPROVE
Chairman of the P(C)K
"___" ___________20___
EXERCISE
For graduate work
student _________________________________________________________________
groups __________ Specialty ___________________________________________
1. Subject: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
approved by the order of the director No. __ dated "___" ____________ 20___
2. The deadline for submitting work to the P (C) K "___" ___________ 20__
3. Initial data for the performance of work:
3.1. Objective:
3.2. Object of study:
_____________________________________________________________________________
3.3. Tools (methods, techniques, etc.):
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
3.4. The main expected results of the work:
1) The theoretical part (chapter) of the final qualifying work, revealing questions about ………….
2) Practical part(chapter) of the final qualifying work, including fragments of lessons and their analysis ………..
4. List of issues to be worked out:
5. List of illustrative material:
2)……..
3)……
6. Control schedule for the completion of the final qualifying work:
7. Consultants on related issues of the final qualification work:
Practice base:
8. Date of issue of the task: "____" ____________ 20 _
APPENDIX 3
Graduate work schedule
Speciality __
Group No.
Full name of the student __
Topic of the thesis
___ ___ _______________________________________________________________
Date Student's signature
Date Supervisor's signature
APPENDIX 4
Feedback Form
"TYUMEN PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGE"
head of the final qualifying work
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Speciality: ____________________________
Assessment of compliance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard for the preparedness of the author of the final work
| Requirements to vocational training | Corresponds | Mainly in line with | Does not match |
| To be able to correctly formulate and set tasks (problems) of their activities when performing WRC, analyze, diagnose the causes of problems, their relevance | + | ||
| Set priorities and methods for solving assigned tasks (problems) | + | ||
| Be able to use psychological, pedagogical and methodological information - correctly assess and summarize the degree of study of the object of study | + | ||
| Own various methods of collecting, storing and processing (editing) information used in the field of professional activity | + | ||
| Own modern information, pedagogical and computer technologies and use their capabilities in solving the tasks (problems) | + | ||
| Be able to rationally plan the time of work, determine the competent sequence of the task | + | ||
| Be able to objectively analyze and evaluate the results obtained | + | ||
| Be able to draw independent, reasonable and reliable conclusions from the work done | + | ||
| Be able to use scientific literature of a professional orientation | + |
Noted merits of the work: _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Deficiencies noted:_____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Conclusion: The work meets (does not meet) the requirements and can (cannot) be recommended for defense at a meeting of the state attestation commission.
FULL NAME. head, academic title, degree, position: ___________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
"_____" ______ 201__ __________________________ (signature)
APPENDIX 5
Sample control sheet
NORMAL CONTROL
Final qualifying work of a student (s) of ____________ group ___ specialty ___________________________________________________
Theme of the final qualifying work __________________________________________________________________
WRC analysis for compliance with the requirements
| № | An object | Options | Compliant (+) / Non-compliant (-) |
| Topic name | Corresponds to the approved topic | ||
| Font size | 14 pins | ||
| Font name | Times New Roman | ||
| Line spacing | 1,5 | ||
| Paragraph | 1,25 | ||
| Margins (mm) | Left -30 mm, right - 10 mm, top - 20 mm, bottom - 20 mm | ||
| Total amount of work | 40-50 printed pages | ||
| Pagination | Through, at the bottom of the sheet, on the right in Arabic numerals | ||
| The sequence of structural parts of the work | Title page, Table of contents, Introduction, Main part, Conclusion, References, Applications. | ||
| Registration of structural parts of the work | The table of contents includes the headings of all chapters, paragraphs, applications, indicating home pages | ||
| Each structural part starts on a new page. | |||
| The names are given with a paragraph indent from a capital letter. | |||
| The distance between the title and the text is one line | |||
| Dot at the end of the name is not put | |||
| Quantity and design of used literature | 30 bibliographic, reference and literary sources, Internet resources | ||
| References in alphabetical order | |||
| Making references to literature | Literature references are in square brackets () | ||
| Link numbering through | |||
| The number of references in the text corresponds to the list of references | |||
| Table design | |||
| Design of drawings | Placed after mention in the text |
The normative control was carried out by the head of the WRC _________________ /________________/
Familiarized with the results of standard control: _________________ /________________/
The date ____________
Comments removed: ______________ /______________________/ _________
(signature) (full name of head) (date)
APPENDIX 6
Review form
department of education and science of the tyumen region
Tyumen region
"TYUMEN PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGE"
Review
for graduate work
on the topic_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
student(s) __________________________________________________________________
(full name, group)
Final qualifying work of _______ pages, contains tables _______,
drawings ________, applications _________.
1. Dedicated to (relevance and significance of the topic) ____________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Validity of the methodological and methodological apparatus _____________________
__________________________________________________________________
3. Correspondence of the content of the work with the topic __________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
4. Theoretical elaboration of the research problem __________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Analysis of the validity of empirical findings and recommendations __________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Practical significance of the work _______________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
7. Quality of design __________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
8. Disadvantages of work __________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
FULL NAME. reviewer, academic title, degree, position _____________________________________________________________________________
«_____» _____________ 201_ _G. __________________________ (signature of the reviewer)
APPENDIX 7
Title page sample
department of education and science of the tyumen region
State Autonomous Vocational Educational Institution
Tyumen region
"TYUMEN PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGE"
Final qualifying work
by specialty (specialty name)
(Work theme)
Tyumen, 2015
APPENDIX 8
| INTRODUCTION | |
| CHAPTER 1 | |
| 1.1. The role of communicative universal learning activities in communication junior schoolchildren | |
| 1.2. Characteristics of the didactic game as a means of forming communicative universal educational activities among younger students | |
| 1.3. Methodology for the use of didactic games for the formation of communicative universal educational activities of younger students | |
| Conclusions for chapter 1 | |
| CHAPTER 2 | |
| 2.1. The results of the study on the levels of formation of communicative universal educational actions among younger schoolchildren at the ascertaining stage of the experiment | |
| 2.2. The use of didactic games in the classroom for the organization of communicative activities of younger students | |
| 2.3. Verification of the effectiveness of the use of didactic games for the formation of communicative universal educational activities among students | |
| Conclusions on chapter 2 | |
| CONCLUSION | |
| BIBLIOGRAPHY | |
| APPENDIX |
The final qualifying work must contain:
1. title page,
2. assignment for WRC,
3. review for WRC,
4. review of the WRC,
6. introduction,
7. main part (at least two main sections, each of which includes at least three subsections);
8. conclusion,
9. bibliography (list of normative legal acts and literature),
10. applications.
The work is presented in bound form and on electronic media.
Requirements for the content of the WRC:
1. Introduction is an important part of the WRC, which should consider the following issues:
Substantiation of the theoretical relevance and practical significance of the chosen topic;
The formulation of the goals of the work and, in connection with this, the definition of tasks, the solution of which is necessary to achieve it.
The formulations of the object and subject of research are given. The subject of the study should indicate the area with which the topic of the WRC is related. For example, in the specialty 38.02.01 Economics and accounting (by industry), such an area may be: the accounting policy of an organization, the procedure and features of accounting for individual objects, audit and analysis of economic and financial activities, taxation features, the procedure for organizing document flow.
By specialty 38.02.07 Banking, such an area can be: the procedure for organizing document circulation, the procedure and features of accounting for individual objects, methods for assessing the creditworthiness of a client of credit organizations, the safety of banks, the features of banking operations, financial management in credit institutions, etc.
The object of the study is the organization on the actual material of which the study is conducted.
The introduction should not exceed 2-3 pages.
2. The first section of the WRC is a theoretical part of the work in which the student makes an analysis of the current state of the issue under study, the degree of its elaboration. In this section, depending on the topic of the study, it is necessary to conduct a critical analysis of various opinions on the issue under study and give your own assessment of the debatable issues or summarize the existing practice of resolving this issue, including its legislative support, and also formulate possible ways to effectively resolve the tasks.
3. The second section of the WRC is usually computational and analytical, i.e. practical part of the work. It provides information about the organization, which makes it possible to further compose its technical and economic characteristics, provides information on accounting policies, rules for maintaining document circulation, features of accounting, management accounting, analyzes financial and economic activity form-based financial statements, the results of the audit report, the financial support of economic activities, the applied calculation methods. The analysis of the state of the investigated issue (problem) in a particular organization is carried out on the basis of analytical tables, graphs.
Section 2 necessarily identifies the problems of the organization under study related to the subject under study, unused reserves of the organization are identified and recommendations are formulated to improve the efficiency of the organization. Conclusions are formulated at the end of the section.
The second section of the WRC should be approximately 25-30 pages long.
4. In Conclusion The WRC presents all the main conclusions and the achieved results of all the work, recommendations on the possibilities of applying the results obtained. At the same time, the degree of achievement of the set goals, the student's personal contribution to the results obtained or the improvement of the resulting indicators should be especially noted.
The volume of the "Conclusion" is about 3-4 pages.
5. In bibliography normative legal acts, scientific papers, articles and other sources used in writing the work are included, indicating the surnames, initials of the authors, the title of the work, the names of publishers, the year and place of publication.
6. In applications WRC contains materials confirming the reliability of the studies, for example, summary tables, graphs, calculations performed on the basis of known methods, as well as other documents essential for this work. For example, the provisions on structural divisions organizations, job descriptions for certain categories of workers, completed samples of applicable primary documents, workflow schedule, accounting registers, order on accounting policy, reporting forms used to analyze financial and economic activities, etc.
In general, when writing the main sections of the WRC, the following recommendations should be followed:
1. The titles of chapters, subsections must correspond to the theme of the WRC.
2. The names of the subsections must correspond to the title of the chapter.
3. The conclusions of each section, summarizing the material presented, should serve as a logical transition to the next section.
4. It is necessary to comply with the text part of the WRC and the tabular, graphic and calculation materials provided, both in terms of their volume and the necessary comments.
5. When writing the WRC, it is unacceptable to use outdated regulatory legal acts, except when compared with new edition document.
The total volume of the WRC should not exceed 35-45 pages. Applications are not included in the total volume of the WRC.
7. WQR is issued in accordance with the Guidelines for the design of text educational documents for students of all specialties and forms of education
WRC defense procedure
1. Students who have successfully completed the mastery of the main educational program who have successfully passed intermediate attestation tests and are admitted to the defense of final qualifying works. The admission is issued by order of the director of the institute.
2. The defense of the WQR is held at an open meeting of the State Examination Commission in the specialty. The procedure for the work of the SEC is determined by the Regulations on the State Examination Commission.
3. The public defense procedure provides for:
Hearing the review of the head of the WRC with a description of the degree of development of professional and general competencies, as well as personal qualities graduate;
Hearing a review with an assessment of the content of the work;
Graduate report;
Questions to the graduate on the work submitted for defense;
Listening to the answers of the graduate to the questions and comments of the members of the SEC on the WRC;
Graduate's responses to comments on WRC;
4. The report must contain:
Statement of the problem and assessment of its relevance;
The purpose and tasks that were set in the process of performing the work;
The main results of the study for each of the formulated tasks of the WRC;
In the process of the report, the student must refer to the handout, which is transmitted to the members of the SEC before the start of the report.
· production sheet, which indicates the name of the topic, the author of the work, supervisor and consultants, the purpose and objectives of the study;
Characteristics of the subject and object of research;
· methodology for conducting research aimed at achieving the goal of the WRC;
· the results of the analysis of the tasks set and the main conclusions;
5. Upon completion of the defense procedure at a closed meeting of the SEC, by a simple majority of votes of the members of the commission participating in the meeting, a decision is made to evaluate the WRC.
The results of the defense are determined by the marks "excellent", "good", "satisfactory" and "unsatisfactory", which are announced on the day of the defense.
Members of the State Examination Commission in the minutes of the meeting on the defense of Graduate Qualification Works may express a dissenting opinion on the level of theoretical and practical research in separate final qualifying works.
When evaluating the results of the defense, the SEC members are guided by the content of the WRC, the relevance of the chosen topic, the quality of the report, calculated and graphic materials, the degree of independence in the performance of work, the achievement of goals, and also take into account the level of general scientific, theoretical and practical training of the graduate student in this specialty.
6. If a student fails to appear for the defense of the final qualification work due to illness, the student provides a medical certificate to the educational unit of the secondary vocational education department.
On the basis of a student's personal application, he may be given the opportunity to defend the WQR on another day, but during the work of the State Examination Commission.
7. A student who is not admitted to the defense of the WQR or who received an unsatisfactory grade during the defense has the right to submit the WQR for the defense again in accordance with the established procedure.
At the request of the student, an academic certificate is issued to him.
8. All WRCs after their successful defense are stored in the archives of the institute. Their copies can be issued to organizations (enterprises) for practical use at the written request of the latter.
The issuance of original works from the archive is prohibited.
ATTACHMENT 1
Chairman of the cycle commission
"General professional and
Special economic disciplines"
G.M. Revenko
from a student of the group ____________
_____________________________
STATEMENT
I ask for permission to write a final qualifying work
Topic – short wording research problems. Problem- a complex theoretical or practical issue that requires study and subsequent solution. The theme of the WRC (RC) should be relevant. Relevance- Significance, importance, priority among other topics and events, compliance with the current state and prospects for the development of science, technology, and society. The ability to formulate a research topic and prove its relevance is the first step to a successful defense.
Purpose of the study- this is a mental anticipation (prediction) of the result, the determination of optimal ways to solve problems in the conditions of choosing research methods and techniques in the process of preparing the WRC (RC). The goal is formulated based on the title of the work. The goal, as a rule, has a practice-oriented character and is not limited to "research", "analysis", "study".
Examples of successful goal setting:
Development…;
development of … methods state regulation;
improvement of strategic and operational marketing tools for the dynamic development of the domestic tourism market;
substantiation of theoretical provisions and development practical advice aimed at developing methods and forms of management marketing activities in the area....
Research objectives are formed on the basis of the goal, reveal and concretize it. The number of tasks cannot be less than three (according to the number of main sections of the qualifying work), but not more than 5-6, because excessive detailing of tasks complicates the adequate presentation of materials.
Under object of study refers to a phenomenon (process) that creates the problem situation under study and exists independently of the researcher. Subject of study is a part of the object of study: it is understood as properties, features or aspects of the object that are significant from a theoretical or practical point of view.
Research method is a set of techniques, a way to obtain reliable scientific knowledge, skills, practical skills and data in various fields.
Scientific novelty depending on the nature and essence of the study, it can be formulated in different ways. For theoretical works, scientific novelty is determined by what is new in the theory and methodology of the subject under study. For works of a practical orientation, scientific novelty is determined by the result that was obtained for the first time, possibly confirmed and updated, or develops and refines previously established scientific ideas and practical achievements.
If there is no scientific novelty in the work. should be pointed to Significant results obtained as a result of the study.
Practical significance should be presented with conclusions about the usefulness of the study and the data obtained as a result of this study, as well as recommendations for their practical use.
The topics of the WRC are developed and approved by the graduating department in accordance with its scientific direction. The student can offer his own topic, justifying the expediency of its development. Qualification papers on one problem can be performed by several students if the topic, goals and objectives of the study are different.
The final qualifying work should reflect the student's ability on one's own collect, organize materials undergraduate practice and analyze the situation (trends) in a given area of social relations or activity.
When choosing a topic of work, the student needs to pay attention to the study of the theory of the problem, using the approaches of different authors, factual and statistical material. The selected topic of the WRC (CR) is drawn up by the student's application addressed to the head of the graduating department (Appendix K) no later than 6 months before the start of the defense and is drawn up by order of the director of the FEFU SHEM.
The topic of the WRC is approved by the department before the start of undergraduate practice. At the same time, a supervisor and, if necessary, consultants are assigned to the student, deadlines are set.
The head of the WRC is appointed from among the employees of the departments of the SHEM, who have highly qualified, as well as leading specialists of enterprises, institutions, research institutes.
The manager draws up the Assignment for the implementation of the WRC (Appendix B) or the CD. The topic of the WRC and the assignment for the performance of the work are discussed at a meeting of the department.
The task is signed by the student and the head of the WQR, certified by the head of the department, and by the time of defense, together with the work, it is submitted to the State Examination Commission (SEC).
Based on the assignment, the student develops a WRC plan, which is agreed with the supervisor. The graduate is responsible for the theoretical and practical development of the topic, the quality, content and design of the WRC.
Failure to meet the deadlines for the completion of the WRC is considered as a violation of the schedule (Appendix D) and is taken into account in the final assessment. The leader is present at the defense of the work.
1.3 Working with bibliographic sources and drawing up a plan for the final qualifying work (term paper)
It is necessary to familiarize yourself with the fundamental sources of information on the topic (textbooks, study guides, monographs, statistical collections, reference books), periodicals(magazines, newspapers, bulletins of normative acts, collections scientific papers, materials of conferences).
Having chosen the most appropriate sources of information, it is necessary to study them in order to theoretically master the problem posed in the work, as well as competently and fully draw up a research plan.
When drawing up a plan, it is necessary to take into account the requirements for the structure and content of the WRC (RC), as well as the problems identified in the process of studying the literature on the chosen topic. The titles of sections should not repeat the title of the topic, and the titles of subsections (paragraphs) should not repeat the titles of sections. All titles should reflect the main directions and expected results of the study. In the process of work, the plan can be adjusted if it is caused by an objective need. Adjustment of the WRC (RC) plan and control over compliance with the schedule for its preparation is carried out by the head.
2 The structure and content of the final qualification and term paper
2.1 Structural elements of the WRC and the RC, following in the sequence below, are:
- title page - first page (Appendix A, B). Decor reverse side the title page of the WRC must comply with Appendix B;
- task for the performance of work - the second page (Appendix B);
– introduction – fourth page;
– terms, definitions and abbreviations (if necessary);
- the main part (for the WRC - sections 1, 2, 3; for the KR - sections 1.2, as an exception, section 3 is possible);
- conclusion;
– list of sources used;
- Appendix;
– WRC preparation schedule (Appendix D);
– feedback (Appendix E);
– review (Appendix G);
- a certificate on the letterhead of the enterprise on the implementation of the results of the WRC - if available (Appendix I).
The schedule for the preparation of the WRC, the review, the review, the certificate of the implementation of the results of the work in the WRC are not filed, but are attached to the work.
2.2 General scope of the WRC excluding applications: specialist - 70-100 pages of printed text, bachelor's degree - 50-60 pages of printed text, master's thesis - 100-120 pages of printed text. The optimal amount of term paper is 30-35 pages of computer text (if necessary, the volume can be increased).
After the heading and subheading put a dot, then give the page number on which this structural element begins.
The introduction is placed on the next page after the page on which the Table of Contents element ends. The word "Introduction" is placed at the top of the page in the middle, begins with a capital letter and is highlighted in bold. The introduction text is not divided into structural elements (paragraphs, subparagraphs, etc.).
The volume of the introduction should not exceed five pages, it should not give definitions, tables, graphic material. The introduction should include:
1 relevance of the topic of the WRC (RC);
2 the formulation of the problem to be solved, and the state of this problem at a given point in time, with reference to the work of leading experts in this field;
3 setting the goal and objectives of the study;
4 substantiation of the subject and object of research;
5 indication of research methods;
6 description of the research logic;
7 the degree of development of the chosen problem, indicating the scientists who have made a significant contribution to research in the area under study;
8 the structure of the work indicating the number of sources used.
The main part may consist of several sections (usually three). Sections are numbered with Arabic numerals, subsections - with Arabic numerals separated by a dot. Each section starts on a new page.
First section dedicated to the analysis of theoretical provisions and practical approaches should provide theoretical basis for later presentation. The student presents only the theoretical material that he needs to solve the issues defined by the goals and objectives of the WRC (RC). Departure from this requirement leads to an excessive increase in the volume of the first section, or to a separation from the content of the second and third sections of the WRC (RC).
The first section should not be a presentation of the material academic disciplines, but to be a critical analysis of the theory on the chosen topic. The quality of the material in this section is usually evidenced by a list of literature sources that should be referenced in the text. Conclusions (summary) should be drawn at the end of each section.
In the second section analyzes domestic and foreign practice solutions to the problem under consideration, as a rule, on the example of a particular enterprise. Analysis of the solution to the problem should contain not only positive, but also negative assessments. This section involves an analysis of the object of study and should contain its brief description, including a description, economic potential, degree of use of resources, efficiency of functioning, place in the social division of labor, rating in the system of similar objects.
Next, you should analyze the state of the object over the past 2-3 years, identify trends in the development of the object over a number of years, and evaluate these trends. Qualitative and especially quantitative analysis economic process(problems) in to a large extent depends on the completeness and reliability of the information base used. Gaining access to these databases is one of the tasks that a student can solve independently.
Based on the results of the study, conclusions should be drawn that should emphasize the positive and negative trends in the development of the object of study, confirm the existence of the problem identified in the first chapter, and state the need to solve it.
In the third section, which is the design part of the study, provides its own data on the ways and methods of improving (modernizing) the object of study. The student's proposals must be theoretically substantiated, supported by appropriate graphs, tables and calculations. Here it is also necessary to determine the economic or social effect that can be obtained by introducing proposals into the practice of managing and managing.
In the absence of their own solution to the problem, the student must study the best domestic and foreign experience on the problem under consideration, the recommendations of scientists and practitioners and choose from them the option that can be implemented in the current conditions with the greatest benefit. In any case, it is necessary to present a strategy (strategic vision) for solving the problem under study at the macro, meso and micro levels. According to the results of the study carried out in the third section, it is necessary to draw a conclusion (summary).
The conclusion of up to 5 pages reflects the main results of the work. It formulates conclusions, indicates the degree of achievement of the goal. If proposals have been formulated to improve the activity of the object under study, then they are placed after the conclusions. Recommendations should be targeted and economically justified.
It is desirable to provide materials confirming the alleged economical effect from implementation. If the economic effect cannot be calculated, then the social, scientific, legal, national and other values of the proposed proposal are indicated.
Topic– a brief formulation of the research problem. Problem- a complex theoretical or practical issue that requires study and subsequent solution. The theme of the WRC (RC) should be relevant. Relevance- Significance, importance, priority among other topics and events, compliance with the current state and prospects for the development of science, technology, and society. The ability to formulate a research topic and prove its relevance is the first step to a successful defense.
Purpose of the study- this is a mental anticipation (prediction) of the result, the determination of optimal ways to solve problems in the conditions of choosing research methods and techniques in the process of preparing the WRC (RC). The goal is formulated based on the title of the work. The goal, as a rule, has a practice-oriented character and is not limited to "research", "analysis", "study".
Examples of successful goal setting:
Development…;
development ... methods of state regulation;
improvement of strategic and operational marketing tools for the dynamic development of the domestic tourism market;
substantiation of theoretical provisions and development of practical recommendations aimed at the development of methods and forms of management of marketing activities in the field of ... ..
Research objectives are formed on the basis of the goal, reveal and concretize it. The number of tasks cannot be less than three (according to the number of main sections of the qualifying work), but not more than 5-6, because excessive detailing of tasks complicates the adequate presentation of materials.
Under object of study refers to a phenomenon (process) that creates the problem situation under study and exists independently of the researcher. Subject of study is a part of the object of study: it is understood as properties, features or aspects of the object that are significant from a theoretical or practical point of view.
Research method is a set of techniques, a way to obtain reliable scientific knowledge, skills, practical skills and data in various fields.
Scientific novelty depending on the nature and essence of the study, it can be formulated in different ways. For theoretical works, scientific novelty is determined by what is new in the theory and methodology of the subject under study. For works of a practical orientation, scientific novelty is determined by the result that was obtained for the first time, possibly confirmed and updated, or develops and refines previously established scientific ideas and practical achievements.
If there is no scientific novelty in the work. should be pointed to Significant results obtained as a result of the study.
Practical significance should be presented with conclusions about the usefulness of the study and the data obtained as a result of this study, as well as recommendations for their practical use.
The topics of the WRC are developed and approved by the graduating department in accordance with its scientific direction. The student can offer his own topic, justifying the expediency of its development. Qualification papers on one problem can be performed by several students if the topic, goals and objectives of the study are different.
The final qualifying work should reflect the student's ability on one's own collect, systematize the materials of undergraduate practice and analyze the situation (trends) in this area of social relations or activities.
When choosing a topic of work, the student needs to pay attention to the study of the theory of the problem, using the approaches of different authors, factual and statistical material. The selected topic of the WRC (CR) is drawn up by the student's application addressed to the head of the graduating department (Appendix K) no later than 6 months before the start of the defense and is drawn up by order of the director of the FEFU SHEM.
The topic of the WRC is approved by the department before the start of undergraduate practice. At the same time, a supervisor and, if necessary, consultants are assigned to the student, deadlines are set.
The head of the WRC is appointed from among the highly qualified employees of the SEM departments, as well as leading specialists from enterprises, institutions, and research institutes.
The manager draws up the Assignment for the implementation of the WRC (Appendix B) or the CD. The topic of the WRC and the assignment for the performance of the work are discussed at a meeting of the department.
The task is signed by the student and the head of the WQR, certified by the head of the department, and by the time of defense, together with the work, it is submitted to the State Examination Commission (SEC).
Based on the assignment, the student develops a WRC plan, which is agreed with the supervisor. The graduate is responsible for the theoretical and practical development of the topic, the quality, content and design of the WRC.
Failure to meet the deadlines for the completion of the WRC is considered as a violation of the schedule (Appendix D) and is taken into account in the final assessment. The leader is present at the defense of the work.
1.3 Working with bibliographic sources and drawing up a plan for the final qualifying work (term paper)
It is necessary to familiarize yourself with the fundamental sources of information on the topic (textbooks, manuals, monographs, statistical collections, reference books), periodicals (magazines, newspapers, bulletins of regulations, collections of scientific papers, conference proceedings).
Having chosen the most appropriate sources of information, it is necessary to study them in order to theoretically master the problem posed in the work, as well as competently and fully draw up a research plan.
When drawing up a plan, it is necessary to take into account the requirements for the structure and content of the WRC (RC), as well as the problems identified in the process of studying the literature on the chosen topic. The titles of sections should not repeat the title of the topic, and the titles of subsections (paragraphs) should not repeat the titles of sections. All titles should reflect the main directions and expected results of the study. In the process of work, the plan can be adjusted if it is caused by an objective need. Adjustment of the WRC (RC) plan and control over compliance with the schedule for its preparation is carried out by the head.
2 The structure and content of the final qualification and term paper
2.1 Structural elements of the WRC and the RC, following in the sequence below, are:
- title page - first page (Appendix A, B). The design of the reverse side of the title page of the WRC must comply with Appendix B;
- task for the performance of work - the second page (Appendix B);
– introduction – fourth page;
– terms, definitions and abbreviations (if necessary);
- the main part (for the WRC - sections 1, 2, 3; for the KR - sections 1.2, as an exception, section 3 is possible);
- conclusion;
– list of sources used;
- Appendix;
– WRC preparation schedule (Appendix D);
– feedback (Appendix E);
– review (Appendix G);
- a certificate on the letterhead of the enterprise on the implementation of the results of the WRC - if available (Appendix I).
The schedule for the preparation of the WRC, the review, the review, the certificate of the implementation of the results of the work in the WRC are not filed, but are attached to the work.
2.2 General scope of the WRC excluding applications: specialist - 70-100 pages of printed text, bachelor's degree - 50-60 pages of printed text, master's thesis - 100-120 pages of printed text. The optimal amount of term paper is 30-35 pages of computer text (if necessary, the volume can be increased).
After the heading and subheading put a dot, then give the page number on which this structural element begins.
The introduction is placed on the next page after the page on which the Table of Contents element ends. The word "Introduction" is placed at the top of the page in the middle, begins with a capital letter and is highlighted in bold. The introduction text is not divided into structural elements (paragraphs, subparagraphs, etc.).
The volume of the introduction should not exceed five pages, it should not give definitions, tables, graphic material. The introduction should include:
1 relevance of the topic of the WRC (RC);
2 the formulation of the problem to be solved, and the state of this problem at a given point in time, with reference to the work of leading experts in this field;
3 setting the goal and objectives of the study;
4 substantiation of the subject and object of research;
5 indication of research methods;
6 description of the research logic;
7 the degree of development of the chosen problem, indicating the scientists who have made a significant contribution to research in the area under study;
8 the structure of the work indicating the number of sources used.
The main part may consist of several sections (usually three). Sections are numbered with Arabic numerals, subsections - with Arabic numerals separated by a dot. Each section starts on a new page.
First section devoted to the analysis of theoretical positions and practical approaches, should provide a theoretical basis for the subsequent presentation. The student presents only the theoretical material that he needs to solve the issues defined by the goals and objectives of the WRC (RC). Departure from this requirement leads to an excessive increase in the volume of the first section, or to a separation from the content of the second and third sections of the WRC (RC).
The first section should not be a presentation of the material of academic disciplines, but a critical analysis of the theory on the chosen topic. The quality of the material in this section is usually evidenced by a list of literature sources that should be referenced in the text. Conclusions (summary) should be drawn at the end of each section.
In the second section domestic and foreign practice of solving the problem under consideration is analyzed, as a rule, on the example of a particular enterprise. Analysis of the solution to the problem should contain not only positive, but also negative assessments. This section involves an analysis of the object of study and should contain its brief description, including a description, economic potential, degree of use of resources, efficiency of functioning, place in the social division of labor, rating in the system of similar objects.
Next, you should analyze the state of the object over the past 2-3 years, identify trends in the development of the object over a number of years, and evaluate these trends. Qualitative and especially quantitative analysis of the economic process (problem) largely depends on the completeness and reliability of the information base used. Gaining access to these databases is one of the tasks that a student can solve independently.
Based on the results of the study, conclusions should be drawn that should emphasize the positive and negative trends in the development of the object of study, confirm the existence of the problem identified in the first chapter, and state the need to solve it.
In the third section, which is the design part of the study, provides its own data on the ways and methods of improving (modernizing) the object of study. The student's proposals must be theoretically substantiated, supported by appropriate graphs, tables and calculations. Here it is also necessary to determine the economic or social effect that can be obtained by introducing proposals into the practice of managing and managing.
In the absence of their own solution to the problem, the student must study the best domestic and foreign experience on the problem under consideration, the recommendations of scientists and practitioners and choose from them the option that can be implemented in the current conditions with the greatest benefit. In any case, it is necessary to present a strategy (strategic vision) for solving the problem under study at the macro, meso and micro levels. According to the results of the study carried out in the third section, it is necessary to draw a conclusion (summary).
The conclusion of up to 5 pages reflects the main results of the work. It formulates conclusions, indicates the degree of achievement of the goal. If proposals have been formulated to improve the activity of the object under study, then they are placed after the conclusions. Recommendations should be targeted and economically justified.
It is desirable to provide materials confirming the expected economic effect of the implementation. If the economic effect cannot be calculated, then the social, scientific, legal, national and other values of the proposed proposal are indicated.
2.7 The list of sources used should contain literature sources and network resources and give an idea of the level of theoretical and practical study of the problem. The list includes literature for which there are footnotes in the WRC (RC). Each source in the list must be numbered:
Competences of a university graduate as a cumulative expected result upon completion of training in the profile "Management of an organization":
Possession of a culture of thinking, the ability to perceive, generalize and analyze information, set a goal and choose ways to achieve it (OK-5),
the ability to logically correctly, reasonably and clearly build oral and written speech (OK-6),
the ability to analyze socially significant processes and phenomena (OK-13),
the ability to design an organizational structure, to carry out the distribution of powers and responsibilities on the basis of their delegation (PC-2),
the ability to effectively organize group work based on knowledge of the processes of group dynamics and the principles of team formation (PC-5),
the ability to assess the conditions and consequences of organizational and managerial decisions (PC-8),
· own project management methods and readiness for their implementation using modern software (PC-20),
ability to economic way of thinking (PC-26),
the ability to analyze financial statements and make informed investment, credit and financial decisions (PC-40),
the ability to evaluate investment projects under various conditions of investment and financing (PC-43),
the ability to find and evaluate new market opportunities and formulate a business idea (PC-48),
· the ability to find and evaluate new market opportunities and formulate a business idea (PC-49).
Selection and approval of the topic of the WRC
The choice of the topic of bachelor's work is determined by:
The level of knowledge of the student in the main disciplines of the curriculum,
The place of work (base of industrial practice) of the graduate,
Scientific interests of the graduate,
The practical orientation of the WRC.
The topics of the WRC should be relevant, correspond to the current state and prospects for the development of the organization (enterprise).
In addition, the topic of the WRC may be of a research nature.
With this in mind, the topic of bachelor's work is determined by the student independently, while it is necessary to take into account the possibility of obtaining specific statistical data on the object of the graduate work, as well as the availability of special scientific and educational literature on the problems considered in the work.
The main criterion for a graduate to choose a topic for a WRC should be the research interest of the student, as well as the interest of the administration of the enterprise (institution, organization), on the example of which the study is being conducted. If the student has a clear idea on which topic he can find the most complete and meaningful material, then, other things being equal, it is this circumstance that can determine the choice of topic.
Approximate topics of graduation bachelor's theses are presented in Appendix A.
Using the right of choice, the student can propose “his own” topic of the WRC, provided that the rationale for its development is justified. For a graduate who did not use the right to choose, the topic of the WRC is assigned at the suggestion of the head.
The choice of the topic of the bachelor's work and its approval must be completed before the end of the work experience.
Assignment for students of the topic of the WRC on his written application and on the proposal of the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems is formalized by order of the Rector of the University.
At the same time, by order of the rector, supervisors of bachelor's works from among professors and associate professors, experienced teachers and researchers of the university are appointed. In addition, researchers and highly qualified specialists of other institutions, organizations and enterprises can be leaders.
WRC leadership
The supervisor is appointed in order to provide the student with theoretical and practical assistance during the preparation and writing of the WRC.
Supervisor:
assists the student in choosing a topic,
gives the task to the student, makes a plan with him,
assists in the choice of methods for conducting analysis and research,
gives qualified advice on the selection of the necessary scientific and educational literature, reference and statistical materials and other sources on the chosen topic,
conducts consultations as necessary,
carries out systematic control over the preparation of bachelor's work,
checks its readiness.
At various stages of the preparation and implementation of the WRC, the tasks of the leader change.
At the first stage, the leader advises how to start considering the topic, corrects the work plan and makes recommendations on the list of references.
During the implementation of the WRC, the leader acts as an opponent, points out to the student the shortcomings of the argumentation, composition, style, etc., gives advice on how to eliminate them.
The student should perceive the recommendations and comments of the supervisor creatively. He can take them into account or reject them at his own discretion, since the responsibility for the theoretically and methodically correct development and coverage of the topic, the quality of the content and design of the WRC lies entirely with the student - the author of the work.
At the suggestion of the head, if necessary, the graduating department provides the right to invite consultants for individual sections of the work at the expense of the time allotted for the management of the WRC. Professors and researchers of the university or other enterprises and organizations may be appointed as consultants. The consultant checks the relevant part of the student's work and puts his signature on it.
The student - the author of the work - is responsible for the decisions made in the WRC and for the correctness of all the given data.
The completed bachelor's thesis, signed by the student and, if necessary, by the consultant, is transferred to the supervisor.
After reviewing and approving the work, the supervisor gives feedback. The review should describe the work done by the student on the preparation of the WRC for each of its sections. The review gives a comprehensive description of the quality of the bachelor's work, notes the positive aspects, pays special attention to the previously noted shortcomings that have not been eliminated by the student, motivates the possibility or inappropriateness of submitting a diploma to the SAC. In the review, the leader also notes the rhythm of the work, the conscientiousness and independence of the student, his activity and creativity.
Then the WRC is submitted for normative control. In order to bring the work in line with the "Requirements for Regulatory Control", it is necessary to use the guidelines that are posted on the website of the branch www.udgutura.ru in the "Methodological materials" section.
Having received the mark and signature of the normative controller, the student, together with the written review of the head, submits the WRC to the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems, where, based on the materials submitted, the issue of admitting the student to the defense is decided. At the same time, a corresponding entry is made on the title page of the work.
If a decision is made on the impossibility of admitting a student to the defense, an appropriate protocol is drawn up, which is submitted for approval to the rector of the university.
A bachelor's thesis admitted for defense is sent for review.
WRC review
To obtain an additional objective assessment of the student's work, an external review of the bachelor's work is carried out by specialists in the relevant field.
Experts and heads of state, regional and local authorities, enterprises, institutions, organizations of related industries can be involved as reviewers. The presence of higher education from the reviewer is mandatory. Also, professors and teachers of other universities can be involved as reviewers.
The reviewer is obliged to conduct a qualified analysis of the essence and main provisions of the reviewed work and reflect in the review:
The relevance of the chosen topic; - independence of the approach to its disclosure; - the presence of one's own point of view; - the ability to use the methods of scientific research; - the logic of constructing the work and presentation of the material; - the degree of validity of the conclusions and recommendations; - the reliability of the results and their practical significance; - specific comments on the content, conclusions, recommendations and design of the work, indicating sections and pages; - recommendations for evaluating the WRC on a four-point system (“excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory”, “unsatisfactory”). The review is written or printed in any form, recommended the volume of the text is 1-1.5 pages. The review indicates the full name. reviewer, his academic degree, academic title, place of work, position. The reviewer signs the review and puts down the date of its writing. The signature of the reviewer must be certified by the seal of the organization in which he works. The review is not filed with the work, but is attached to it. The WRC with a review, the review of the head must be submitted to the department no later than 7 days before the start of the work of the SAC on protection. Changes to the final qualifying work after receiving the review are not allowed.
At the defense of the WRC in the SAC, it is advisable to additionally provide a review of the organization on whose order the work was performed. It should indicate the practical value of the results obtained and the stage of their implementation.
On the eve of the defense, the Chairman of the SAC gets acquainted with the content of the WRC, reviews of leaders and reviews.
WRC protection
The student, having received a positive feedback from the supervisor, a review by an external reviewer and the decision of the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems on admission to protection, must prepare a report for 4-5 minutes, in which he must clearly and briefly state the main provisions of the work. At the same time, it should be taken into account that usually the basis for the preparation of a report (statement) is the conclusion of the WRC.
For clarity, it is necessary to prepare illustrative material of at least 5 pages with graphs, tables, diagrams (for each member of the commission), which allow concretizing the main provisions of the report.
The report itself and illustrations to it (handout) must be agreed with the head of the WRC.
The report should:
indicate the relevance of the topic of work,
list the issues and problems of the functioning of the WRC object, identified in the process of its implementation,
justify the choice of management decision and prove its effectiveness.
The success of the defense largely depends on the quality of the report, so the issue of its preparation is very serious.
The defense is held at a meeting of the State Examination Commission. It consists of highly qualified university teachers, and in some cases - specialists from enterprises and organizations. The composition of the commission is approved by the order of the rector of the university.
The committee meeting may be attended by WRC leaders, reviewers, as well as students and interested persons.
The order of defense is as follows: first, the student makes a report, then the supervisor's review and review are read out, after which the student responds to the comments made in the review and review.
For each WRC, the commission asks questions. In addition, questions to the student can be asked by the supervisor, the reviewer and all those present. It should be borne in mind that the answers to the questions should be short, clear and convincing. The score for the WRC is set by the commission at the end of the working session. At the same time, the issue of assigning the appropriate qualification to successfully defended students is being resolved. Also, the commission on a number of works can express a dissenting opinion - recommend for implementation, recommend the author for admission to the magistracy, recommend preparing an article based on the project materials, etc.
The decision of the GEC is final. 2. WRC structure
Introduction- this is the introductory part of the WRC, in which the theoretical and practical relevance of the chosen topic is substantiated, the object of the work is determined, its goal and objectives are formulated, and a brief annotation of the main sections is given. The volume of the introduction is up to 3 pages.
Main part The WRC includes several sections (chapters), the number of which depends on the chosen topic and is determined by the student in agreement with the supervisor. It is recommended to form 3 chapters in the main part of the work.
To the first chapter it is advisable to include consideration of the following issues
General characteristics of the organization,
Managment structure,
The staff of the organization and the effectiveness of its use,
External environment (suppliers, customers, competitors) and marketing in the organization,
Analysis of the dynamics of the main economic performance indicators for 2 years.
Giving a general description of the organization, it is advisable to state a brief history of its formation and development, formulate the goals and objectives of the activity, give a brief description of the products (works, services).
Considering the issue of managing an organization, it is necessary to characterize the organizational structure, highlighting the divisions of the managerial level, the main production divisions, auxiliary divisions, and also to characterize the relationship of divisions in the organization.
One of the essential characteristics of the organization is the dependence on the external environment. In this regard, it is necessary to present the actual external environment and consider its impact on the activities of the organization. At the same time, it is important to identify the most significant factors of external influence and effective ways to respond to them.
In the second chapter necessary:
Identify the main problems in the activities of the organization,
Of all the problems, select 1, maximum 2, the most relevant for the organization,
Consider theoretical questions on the topic of WRC,
Develop options for solving a given problem
Conduct an analysis of the proposed options,
To carry out the choice of the most acceptable variant of the managerial solution of the problem posed.
The development of options for solving the problem consists in the formation of 2 or more management decisions.
The formation of management decision options should be accompanied by a theoretical study of the relevant issues. At the same time, it is necessary to assess the degree of knowledge of the problem (problems) posed, consider debatable issues, and analyze domestic and foreign experience. Consideration of theoretical issues on the topic of the work involves the study of about 10 literary sources, which should include monographs of the most authoritative experts on the research problem, articles in scientific journals, publications on the Internet. References to sources in the text of the work are required. Based on the analysis, the own point of view of the author of the final work should be formed, the most important points for the development of the chosen area are listed, taking into account which managerial solutions to the problem will be formed.
When identifying the main problems of activity in the functional areas of management (production, marketing, infrastructure, etc.), it is advisable to conduct a SWOT - analysis, build a "problem tree".
In the third chapter the choice and justification of the management decision is carried out.
Each solution option proposed in the second chapter should contain
Description of the essence of the proposed solution,
Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the design solution for the possible results and required costs of all types of resources (material, labor, financial, etc.),
Characteristics of the sources of formation of resources,
Analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the design solution,
Characteristics of the risks of design decisions,
duration of the project,
Conduct an economic justification of the project (management decision).
On this basis, the choice of a management decision is carried out - a project aimed at solving the problem (problems) posed. The main thing: there must be clear evidence to support the decision.
After the choice of the final decision is made, it is necessary to propose a plan for the implementation of the project.
Conclusion should contain the main conclusions obtained during the implementation of the WRC. It is advisable to include in this section brief conclusions based on the results of the analysis of the organization's activities, the main problems of the organization's management, a brief description of the proposed management decision and the results of calculations for its economic justification.
Bibliography is an integral part of the final work and shows the degree of study of the problem, includes sources that the author used when studying the topic and writing the work, and is drawn up in accordance with the requirements of GOST 7.1.
AT applications materials are removed that facilitate the perception of the main part without overloading it. Appendixes contribute to a wider coverage of the topic, however, the main text of the work should be created in such a way that it is self-sufficient and contains a small number of applications. In terms of content and form, applications can be very different: copies of documents, excerpts from reporting materials, tables, graphs, diagrams, etc. The main test of the work should contain links to all cited applications.
APPENDIX A
Options for graduation thesis topics
1. A comprehensive assessment of the current state and development prospects.
2. Organizational and economic aspects of improving corporate governance.
3. Improving the management structure in the organization.
4. Development of a strategic management project in the organization.
5. Development of the project of operational management in the organization.
6. Improving the quality management system in the organization.
7. Improving the cost management system in the organization.
8. Business plan and its role in improving management.
9. Ways to improve the efficiency and quality of management.
10. Strategic analysis of the external environment of the enterprise.
11. Resource management and evaluation of the effectiveness of their use.
12. Analysis of crisis trends in the organization's activities.
13. Designing the diversification of the organization's activities.
14. Ways to strengthen the financial condition of the organization.
15. Improving the management of the organization's working capital.
16. Improving the mechanism for the formation, distribution and use of profits.
17. Risk management in the organization.
18. Development of the innovative potential of the organization.
19. Improvement of investment activity in the organization.
20. Development and economic justification of the investment project.
21. Organization and improvement of marketing in the corporate management system.
22. Study of pricing factors for products and services.
23. Research needs, supply and demand for goods and services.
24. Forecasting demand for goods and services.
25. Organization and development of Internet marketing in the organization.
26. Ways to improve the competitiveness of the organization.
27. Strategy and tactics of personnel management.
28. Improving the efficiency of managerial work in the organization.
29. Analysis and design of the motivation system in the organization.
30. Development of a logistics system for supply and marketing in the organization.
31. Development and economic justification of the organizational project for the creation of a small business.
32. Development and economic justification of an entrepreneurial project.
33. Improving the information support of the management system.
34. Improving the foreign economic activity of the organization.
35. Formation of corporate culture in the organization.
36. Analysis and design of communications in the organization.
APPENDIX B
"Improving the cost management system in the organization"
Introduction
1.3. Managment structure.
1.4. Personnel and its use.
1.6. Dynamics of the main economic indicators.
Chapter 2. Problems of cost management and ways to solve them
2.1. Cost analysis in the organization
2.2. Theoretical issues of determining factors and reserves for cost reduction
2.3. Identification of the main problems of cost reduction in the organization and building a "problem tree".
2.4. Development of options for management decisions to reduce costs.
Chapter 3. Selection and justification of the decision (project) to reduce costs in the organization.
3.4. Selection of a management decision (project) and assessment of the possibility of cost reduction.
3.5. Project Implementation Plan.
Conclusion
Bibliography
Applications
"Ways to strengthen the financial condition of the organization"
Introduction
Chapter 1. The current state of the organization.
1.1. History of creation and development, organizational and legal form, goals and activities.
1.2. Characteristics of manufactured products (work performed, services rendered).
1.3. Managment structure.
1.4. Personnel and wages.
1.5. External environment and marketing in the organization.
1.6. Dynamics of the main economic indicators
Chapter 2. Problems of strengthening the financial condition and ways to solve them
2.1. Analysis of the financial condition.
2.2. Theoretical issues of determining directions for strengthening the financial condition
2.3. Identification of the main problems of strengthening the financial condition in the organization and building a "tree of problems".
2.4. Development of options for management decisions to strengthen the financial condition.
Chapter 3. Selection and justification of a decision (project) to strengthen the financial condition.
3.1. Calculation of the need for resources to implement the proposed solutions.
3.2. Sources of formation of resources for the implementation of solutions.
3.3. Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed solutions.
3.4. The choice of a management decision (project) and the possibility of improving the financial condition.
3.5. Project implementation plan.
Conclusion
Bibliography
Applications
Similar information.