The ship of anti-submarine and air defense appeared in the plans of military shipbuilding in 1961, when the construction of missile cruisers Project 58 was already well under way. Formally, the basis for the development of a new project, which received number 1134, was the decision of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR No. 1180-510 of December 30, 1961. Shortly before the release of this decision, in the same December 1961, the Main Directorate of Shipbuilding (GUK) of the Navy ordered the Northern Design Bureau to develop a project for an air defense-PLO ship, moreover, immediately from the stage of the technical project, bypassing the draft, which indicated direct continuity Project 1134 towards Project 58.
However, the circumstances that led to the emergence of a new ship were not just a desire to "improve" Project 58, especially since the lead ship of this type has not yet been built and tested. Nor was it a desire to "unite" projects 61 and 58 , as stated in some (even authoritative) sources. True, such a version had the right to exist, but it appeared already on the basis of "similarity" Project 1134 and on Project 58, and on Project 61, that is, de facto.
The practical development of nuclear power for submarines and the beginning of the deployment (abroad and in our country) of submarine strategic nuclear missile systems brought to the fore the already acute problem of anti-submarine warfare. In principle, it was possible to solve this problem in several and, which is very important, in uncontested ways. From the position of today's vision, the role and place of surface ships in its solution were far from being paramount, but it seemed to the political leadership, especially those who were not professionally trained, that anti-submarine ships should have priority in surface shipbuilding.
Another important circumstance was a subjective, but very significant factor, which first identified itself in our shipbuilding in the late 1950s, gained momentum in the 1960s and firmly “saddled” shipbuilding and the fleet for the rest of the Soviet period of their existence, namely - dictate of the established military-industrial complex in matters military-technical policy. The fact is that the complex system of numerous state committees (ministries) and departments that ensure the construction of the fleet has not received an actual unified governing body capable of predicting, coordinating and managing the work of subordinate industries to achieve a common result. Formally, such a body existed in the country - the Commission under the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR on military-industrial issues (in everyday life - the military-industrial complex; not to be confused with another abbreviation that stands for military-industrial complex), however, due to the extreme complexity and huge volume of tasks with its own He didn't really get the job done. In practice, this led to the fact that numerous design bureaus and associations (especially missile ones) developed their equipment, in accordance only with general instructions "from above", according to their own programs, often not being interested in what the organizations cooperating with them were doing. As a result, often not weapons were created “for ships”, but “ships for weapons”. We will return to this thesis later.
In this situation, the timing of the creation of weapons and equipment dictated the timing of the creation of the ship. Designers often encountered a situation where, for example, the firing system is not yet ready, the control systems for it are at the initial stage of development, and the fleet already needs a ship with approved tactical and technical elements (TTE), and it has to be “assembled” from the fact what is. Such improvisation gave rise to the construction of ships in small batches, and even in them last ships often differed quite significantly in their TFCs.
There are more than enough examples of such "creativity" in the history of our shipbuilding of the so-called "stagnant" and "perestroika" periods. Here is some of them. In a series of 20 BOD Project 61 managed to make five modifications: actually Project 61, Project 61 with radar MR-500 "Cleaver", Project 61M, Project 61MP, Project 61E- not counting, of course, the export option 61ME for India. Each of the four nuclear missile cruisers Project 1144("Orlan") had such significant differences in armament that the lead "Admiral Ushakov" (formerly "Kirov") and the last - "Peter the Great" (formerly "Andropov") - can be considered different ships without enumeration. This practice also had its ideological justifications. One of the influential GUK admirals called it "modernization during construction" and sincerely considered it an objective need to introduce the fruits of "scientific and technological progress." However, the fact that, due to such quasi-progressive decisions, the fleet as a result became a “vinaigrette” of ships of various projects and “sub-options”, apparently did not bother the upper echelons much.
Without the examples given, it is difficult to understand the true background of the appearance of ships. Project 1134, which received for the first time in the Soviet fleet also a verbal cipher - "Berkut".
Project numbers for military and civilian ships and vessels, starting from the 1960s, were assigned according to the "hosted" unified system they had no coding of documents and semantic load. Submarines after the war were initially assigned three-digit numbers, surface ships - two-, three-, four-, and finally, from the 1980s. - five digits. If the project had significant differences from the base one, then letters that had different semantic and arbitrary meanings were added to the digital indexing. For example: Project 61M- "modified" 61E- “experimental”, and the same letter “E” with a different number could mean “export”. Thus, a strict system of notation did not exist. Moreover, the "senior" number did not yet say that the project was newer (although in most cases it was exactly so). For example, Project 1124"younger" Project 1134. For ease of handling and for use in open documents in the 1960s ship designs began to be assigned verbal type ciphers. For example, for large combat surface ships, as a rule, the names of birds: "Berkut" ( Project 1134), "Condor" ( Project 1123), "Krechet" ( Project 1143), "Petrel" ( Project 1135) etc. For minesweepers - the names of precious stones. For small warships and boats, a strict system also did not exist. For example, a small anti-submarine ship on automatically controlled hydrofoils (AUPC) Project 1141 had the code "Falcon", and his contemporary - a small rocket ship on the AUPC Project 1240- "Hurricane". In everyday life, a less convenient digital designation, rather than a verbal one, has become commonplace. This happened, apparently, due to the fact that the project numbers were known to a wider circle of specialists who were used to operating with the numbers of previous projects that did not have cipher names.
|
Table 1 The main shipbuilding elements and characteristics of the RRC pr.58 and BOD pr.1134 |
||||
|
Name of elements and characteristics |
Project 1134 |
|||
|
Maximum length (Lnb.), m |
||||
|
Length according to design waterline (Lkvl), m |
||||
|
Width according to design waterline (Vkvl.), m |
||||
|
Draft (T), m |
||||
|
Depth amidships (H), m |
||||
|
Coefficient general completeness, (b) |
||||
|
Ratio L:B |
||||
|
Ratio B:T |
||||
|
Initial metacentric height pr Dtot. (h), m |
||||
|
Sail area, (Sr), cub.m |
||||
|
Standard displacement (Dst.), t |
||||
|
Normal displacement (Dн.), t |
||||
|
Full displacement (Dtot.), t |
||||
|
* - according to the working draft |
||||
|
table 2 |
||||
|
Mass Load Sections |
Project 1134 |
|||
|
Weight, t |
Weight, t |
|||
|
Armament |
||||
|
Ammunition |
||||
|
Mechanisms |
||||
|
electrical equipment |
||||
|
Liquid cargo |
||||
|
Supply |
||||
|
Reserve displacement |
||||
|
Note. For project 58, the mass load is given according to the working design, for project 1134 - according to the technical one with the M-11 "Storm" air defense system |
||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
The main purpose of the anti-submarine ship Project 1134("Berkut") according to the tactical and technical assignment was: ensuring the combat activities of the submarine; protection of their maritime communications from enemy air, surface and submarine forces; support for ASW ships operating in remote areas of the sea (the peculiar style of task formulation draws attention both in terms of “military” terminology, and in their “concreteness” and “clarity” - author). Thus, from the purpose of the ship, the priority role of anti-aircraft (anti-aircraft) and anti-submarine weapons was clearly visible.
The main weapon of the ship was to be the new anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) M-11 "Storm". By its appearance Project 1134 in to a large extent was indebted to him. The developers of the complex - VNII Altair (SME), MKB Fakel (MAP), Design Bureau of the Bolshevik Plant (MOP) - have not yet completed work on the previous M-1 Volna complex and have not actually started work on Storm ", assured shipbuilders and representatives of the fleet that the complex would be ready in 1964-1965. The Northern Design Bureau, having started the technical project immediately after the issuance of the GUK order - in December 1961, completed it in the middle of 1962. Based on the promises of the air defense system developers, it was assumed that the lead ship Project 1134 will be handed over to the fleet in 1965. In fact, work on the complex actually began only in 1961, and ended with its adoption for service only 8 years later - in 1969. A situation that later became almost typical was created in which the ship had to be armed with the wrong people what was planned, but what was mass-produced. Even the postponement of the delivery date of the lead ship from 1965 to 1967 did not solve the problem. I had to adjust the project for the Volna air defense system, which was put into service in 1962 (on a missile cruiser Project 58"Terrible").
Chief designer of the project V.F. Anikiev (later - head of the Nevsky Design Bureau and chief designer the first domestic aircraft carrier project 11435) when designing the hull, initially took as a basis Project 58, especially since TTZ was directly ordered to make a new ship "in the hull of this project." This once again confirms the doubt expressed about the correctness of the version that Project 1134, allegedly, was originally conceived as a "unification" Project 58 and Project 61. "Berkut" was the first ship of V.F. Anikiev as the chief designer.
However, as the data on the weight and volume of new weapons systems (PU SAM "Storm", KSU "Grom", etc.) are refined, which have increased significantly compared to the originally declared ones (which later became almost a law), "keep within » to the body Project 58 became impossible. During the design process, additional requirement on increasing the cruising range from 3,500 to 5,000 miles to enable escort of anti-submarine cruisers (helicopter carriers) Project 1123 type "Condor" ("Moscow"). Note that in real life ships Project 1134 this never happened: both helicopter carriers Project 1123 served all their lives in the Black Sea Fleet, and the BOD Project 1134 in the North and Pacific. This is one example of a "systemic" approach in the construction of the then fleet. Therefore, keeping the contours and the theoretical drawing Project 58, ship hull Project 1134 represented its massive increase.
The main dimensions were the limit for the possibility of building in a closed boathouse of the shipbuilding plant named after. A.A. Zhdanov, on which it was planned to build new large anti-submarine ships (BOD) - this is how they began to be classified already during construction ( table 1).
A comparative analysis of the enlarged weight load shows that in the new project, compared with the prototype, due to the use of a more rational hull framing system, it was possible to reduce its relative weight (by 3% per volume unit), reduce specific gravity electrical equipment (per kW) and the share of systems (by 10%) due to the fact that electrical equipment and systems were accepted mainly according to Project 58, and the ship itself has grown significantly in size.
Architecturally BOD Project 1134 differed from the prototype in a reduced silhouette, which was achieved by combining the chimneys of both engine and boiler rooms (MCS) and bringing it into one tower-like mast. As a result, it was possible to provide better placement of the bow and stern air defense systems. Like on ships Project 58 passages to all rooms and combat posts were closed. The conning tower (GKP) was located under the upper deck. Part of the officers' cabins was located in the superstructure, which should have significantly improved the living conditions of the crew compared to Project 58.
home power plant almost completely repeated the GEM RKR Project 58. The differences were in the placement of turbocharging units directly above the boilers, which significantly reduced the mass and length of the ducts, and in an increase in the steam output of the auxiliary boiler. As a result of the use of GEM Project 58 on a larger ship, the full speed provided by it decreased to 33 knots, and the specific fuel consumption at full speed increased from 845 to 915 kg / mile due to an increase in the number and power of auxiliary mechanisms.
The ship's electrical power system (EESC) compared to that in Project 58 significant changes did not undergo, but due to the increase in the number of consumers (from 3718 to 4787 kW), it was necessary to add another 500 kW to each power plant and at the same time solve the problem of stable parallel operation of three generating units at once. A fundamental innovation was the installation of an automatic control system for EESK, which was previously absent on all ships.
Unlike the RCR Project 58 main on Project 1134 became anti-aircraft weapons ( table 3). The ship was originally supposed to accommodate two new M-11 "Storm" air defense systems with the "Thunder" control system and an ammunition load of 18 V-611 anti-aircraft guided missiles (SAM) for each complex. Most significantly from the previous M-1 Volna air defense system, the M-11 complex differed in a greater firing range: at low altitudes - up to 22 km, at high altitudes - up to 32 km, and at faster (up to 700 m / s) targets. For the M-1 complex, these characteristics were 15 km, 24 km, and 600 m/s, respectively. However, these improvements came at a high price: if the B-600 missiles weighed 985 kg, then the B-611 weighed twice as much (1844 kg). True, the more effective warhead of the latter weighed almost twice as much (126 kg versus 70 for the B-600). "Storm" turned out to be the only "purely" marine complex in our fleet, developed without unification with the air defense systems of the ground forces and air defense forces. For already known reasons, this air defense system did not get on the ship; in the process of detailed design, the project had to be adjusted for the Volna air defense system.
The increase in the dimensions of the ship made it possible to accommodate a larger ammunition load of the V-600 missiles. At first it was supposed to achieve this by placing additional cellars on the upper deck with horizontal storage and rocket loading, but later they found another, more competent solution: vertical feed revolving deck drums were changed to conveyors. Thus, on the BOD Project 1134 for each launcher (PU) there were 32 missiles (64 in total, and on the ship Project 58- 16). Subsequently, the missiles were replaced by the B-601, which was distinguished by an expanded kill zone and the presence of a firing mode at sea targets. The system of conveyor supply of missiles to the launcher led to a change in the index of the latter to ZiF-102 (with a revolver - ZiF-101).
Attack (anti-ship) missile system P-35 on BOD Project 1134 was accepted in a single configuration, but with two new twin non-guided launchers KT-72. These launchers, of course, were lighter than the SM-70 on ships Project 58. In a marching way, they had a zero elevation angle; a fixed angle of 25 degrees was set before firing. Rough guidance of missiles in the horizontal plane was carried out by maneuvering the ship. Initially, the project provided for the placement of a second ammunition load of four 4K-44 missiles, located in the cellars on the upper deck directly in front of the launcher. However, later they were abandoned due to the additional volumes required, the duration of the reloading process, which dragged on for several hours, which was hardly realistic in combat conditions. Thus, the impact capabilities of the BOD Project 1134 allowed to carry out only two two-missile volleys - against four four-missile ones on a cruiser Project 58, although the second salvo series on the latter could only be carried out a few hours after the first. Other differences P-35 complexes installed on ships Project 58 and Project 1134, did not have among themselves, except for some changes in the firing control devices of the "Binom" system, dictated as the experience of their development on the lead ship Project 58, and a decrease in the number of missiles in a salvo.
Frankly speaking, the P-35 complex was an almost complete analogy to the P-6 complex, which was developed simultaneously with the P-35 for submarines Project 651 and 675 by the same design bureau of V.N. Chelomey ( table 4).
Missile control systems, although developed by different research institutes, were also the same in terms of construction principles. The specifics consisted mainly in the fact that, due to the low placement of the antenna post on the fence of the submarine cabin, the P-6 rocket, after a constant climb, had to dive on the target, for which an afterburner was provided in its main engine, which lengthened the rocket. It should be added that if the P-6 used a modified serial turbojet engine (designer S.A. Gavrilov), then for the P-35 a new engine was specially created in the Design Bureau of S.K. Tumansky. For the rest, as can be seen from tab. four, the P-6 complex was generally noticeably better than the P-35 complex and (with a more bulky and heavy rocket) more compact. However, for such a ship as a cruiser, this no longer played a significant role, especially since the ammunition load consisted of only four anti-ship missiles.
If there were a clear justification for this, to put it mildly, disgrace, then it could only lie in the fact that the P-6 was designed for underwater launch, and the P-35 was not. However, the P-6 did not have one, and the launch of the anti-ship missiles was also surface. This confirms the earlier statement about the unlimited dictate of our domestic "rocket barons" and the lack of elementary control and management on the part of those bodies that were supposed to implement them - that is, "customers", of course. However, the latter never knew, and were not interested in what ships and in what quantity would be built for their "products", how these ships would be distributed among the fleets. The prevalence of the same complexes actually turned out to be the following. 16 submarines were built with the P-6 complex Project 651 and 29 submarines Project 675, that is, in total for two theaters - the North and the Pacific - 45 units. On average, 22 boats per theater. With the P-35, 8 ships were built for all four theaters, on average, two per theater. As you can see, the increase in the striking power of the fleets due to missile cruisers turned out to be scanty. In fairness, it can be mentioned that the P-35 was adopted by the coastal missile and artillery troops (BRAV) under the code "Redoubt", but this does not change the essence of the matter: the P-6 would have fit for the BRAV. The above example was rather needed not to show that the good slogan of the tireless "strengthening the country's defense capability" often actually carried out its ruin, but for a more complete understanding of the extremely complex, sometimes confusing and defying logic and common sense zigzags of our naval construction. But if you take a different path - a descriptive registration of facts, an impartial listing of TTX and TTE, completely excluding human and subjective factors, critical analysis and conclusions - then there will never be any practical benefit from studying history (or rather, its falsification).
Artillery armament BOD Project 1134 was adopted even weaker than at the RRC Project 58: two two-gun 57-mm automatic anti-aircraft gun mounts (AU) AK-725 (ZiF-72) with radar control systems "Bars" (MR-103). Developed in 1958, the AK-725 AU (chief designer P.A. Tyurin), put into service in 1962, provided a firing range of about 13 km. The reach in height was 7 km, the rate of fire reached 360-400 rds / min (both barrels). A 57-mm projectile weighing 2.8 kg had an initial velocity of 1020 m/s and was supplied only with an impact fuse with a self-liquidator, as a result of which the indicated ballistic ranges in practice were significantly smaller. Each installation relied on 2200 rounds of ammunition. AU AK-725 was completely uninhabited, and the combat crew for the PUS consisted of eight commanders. A feature of the AU was also the first applied continuous interlayer water cooling of the barrels during firing and tape feed. ships Project 1134 were the first to adopt the AK-725-MR-103 system. Later it was extended to ships Project 1123, 1134A, 206M, 1124 , 1234 , as well as some auxiliary ships and vessels.
Since the ship Project 1134 was classified as a "large anti-submarine", the main attention was supposed to be paid to anti-submarine weapons. However, by the beginning of the development of the project, there were no new weapons even “on paper” - the main efforts of the design bureau of this profile at that time were focused on the development of such weapons for submarines. Therefore, according to the initial technical project, the Berkut was armed with exactly the same means as its predecessor: two three-tube 533-mm caliber and two RBU-6000 with 144 RSL ammunition. However, after the decision was made to abandon the spare anti-ship missiles 4K-44, it became possible to slightly increase the anti-submarine ammunition, therefore, in the course of adjusting the project, five-pipe PTA-53-1134 with Raccoon-2 anti-submarine torpedoes were placed on the ship instead of three-pipe ones. In addition, the ship was additionally armed with less long-range, but more powerful six-barreled RBU-1000 ("Smerch-3"). Suffice it to say that the RSL-10 used from RBU-1000 had four times the weight of explosives than the RSL-60 used from RBU-6000 ("Smerch-2"). The total supply was 48 RSL.
The main change in the Berkut anti-submarine weapons compared to the RKR Project 58 there was some improvement in hydroacoustic weapons: to ensure combat use PLO weapons on the ship were installed by the GAS of the all-round view "Titan" (MG-312) and the target designation "Vychegda" (MG-311). These stations, with favorable hydrology, had a range of 8-10 km in the "SHP" mode (noise direction finding). But a cardinal step in the field of strengthening the anti-submarine capabilities of the ship was to ensure the permanent deployment of the Ka-25 ship helicopter in the anti-submarine or target designation version (Ka-25PL or Ka-25Ts). The increased accommodation and displacement finally made it possible to place a hangar and not quite full-fledged means of support, thanks to which the BOD Project 1134 became the first domestic ship with a permanent basing of a helicopter, for the armament of which 5 PLAT-1 torpedoes and 54 radio-acoustic buoys (RGAB) were provided.
|
Table 3 The composition of the armament of the RKR pr.58 and BOD pr.1134 |
||
|
Armament |
Project 1134 |
|
|
Missile |
2 X 4 PU SCRK P-35 |
2 X 2 PU SCRK P-35 |
|
Missile |
1 X 2 PU SAM "Volna" |
2 X 2 launchers SAM "Volna" |
|
Artillery |
2 X 2 76.2 mm AK-736 |
2 X 2 57mm AK-725 |
|
anti-submarine |
2 X 12 RBU-6000 |
2 X 12 RBU-6000 |
|
Table 4 Comparative performance characteristics of the complexes P-6 and P-35 * |
||
|
RCC characteristics |
||
|
Flight range, km |
||
|
Flight altitude, m |
||
|
Flight speed, m/s |
||
|
Warhead weight, kg |
||
|
Starting weight, kg |
||
|
Diameter of circumscribed circle, m |
||
|
* - data according to the catalog "Weapons of Russia", v.3. In parentheses are data from the book "Weapons of the Russian Navy" (St. Petersburg, 1996, p. 232) |
||
Considering development experience Project 58, two radars of various (finally) types were included in the main radio-technical armament of the ship. The new general detection station "Kliver" (MP-500) solved the problem of lighting the air situation. The Angara-A radar was supposed to generate the initial data for firing the Storm air defense system. However, the development of this radar was delayed even longer than the creation of the air defense system itself. At the stage of the technical project, a three-coordinate version of the Angara radar (MP-310A) was worked out. However, for the Storm air defense system, it turned out to be unsuitable - work was not provided at the maximum range in height, there were great difficulties in developing the third coordinate (elevation angle). With the refusal to deploy the Storm air defense system, the issue disappeared by itself - for the Volna complex, the capabilities of the MR-310A radar turned out to be sufficient. Both radars were combined with state recognition equipment Nickel-KM and Chrome-KM. In addition to the indicated radio equipment, the ship (again for the first time) was armed with Gurzuf A and Gurzuf B active jamming stations (2 complexes), two passive jamming launchers ZIF-121 (PK-2), MRP-13-14 and MRP jamming stations -15-16, stations RTR "Zaliv", as well as navigational radar "Volga".
From the very beginning (unlike RRC Project 58) all BOD Project 1134 received a system for receiving external target designation for firing anti-ship missiles P-35 - "Success-U". To control the ship and the connection, a combined GKP-FKP-BIP was placed on the BOD, equipped with electronic tablets, the Sea-U mutual information exchange system and other necessary instrumentation. The means of communication, according to tradition, was a "set" in bulk "for 20 channels. We had not grown up to complexes yet.
If we evaluate the technical project 1134 established post-war criteria, then it is nothing fundamentally new in comparison with Project 58 did not contain. It was assumed that ships of this type would be built in a rather large (at least 10 units at different factories) series, however, due to the fact that, due to a number of indicated circumstances, the ship was born at least 2-3 years late, these ships became as if a transitional, intermediate type to the new generation of the 1960s - 1970s. In fact, according to Project 1134 built only 4 units. ( table 5) at the shipyard them. A.A. Zhdanova (now - JSC "Severnaya Verf").
|
Table 5 The main dates of the construction of the BOD pr.1134 |
|||||
|
Name of the ship |
Factory |
Dates |
|||
|
bookmarks |
descent |
start |
entry |
||
|
"Admiral Zozulya" |
|||||
|
"Vladivostok" |
|||||
|
"Vice Admiral Drozd" |
|||||
|
"Sevastopol" |
|||||
The names of capital ships, as we can see, have already begun to reflect the anti-traditional confusion and lack of common sense, which then flourished wildly in the 1970s - 1980s. It is interesting in this regard to note that the BOD "Vice Admiral Drozd", which inherited its name from the guards destroyer ( Project 7U) period of the Great Patriotic War, never received either the flag or the guards rank of his predecessor. The reason for this is very prosaic - it simply didn’t occur to anyone then, although on ships under construction at the same time Project 61 such a tradition was nevertheless maintained: the guards BOD "Red Caucasus", "Savvy" and "Red Crimea". The crew of the BOD "Vice-Admiral Drozd" subsequently repeatedly applied for the assignment of the guards rank, but these appeals remained unanswered. The same story happened with Sevastopol - apparently, no one remembered that his predecessor, battleship, was Red Banner. On the contrary, the BOD "Marshal Voroshilov" (followed by a series of ships Project 1134A) The Red Banner flag nevertheless received, despite the fact that the previous cruiser ( Project 26) had a slightly different name - just "Voroshilov" * .
* - In a previous article on the history of the creation of missile cruisers pr.58 (), the author made an involuntary mistake, noting that the Varyag RRC was awarded the guards flag according to the tradition of its predecessor - the famous "grandfather", completed when re-enrolled in the lists of the Russian fleet by the sailors of the Guards crew . As it was possible to clarify, the guards flag went to the "Varyag" from the "Savvy", since the RRC was laid under this name. The question immediately arose, which has not yet received an answer: why, in this case, did the lead “Grozny” not become the Red Banner as the successor to the name of the destroyer (project 7) of the Northern Fleet during the Great Patriotic War? - approx. ed.
ship building technology Project 1134 in general was similar to that for ships Project 58. However, due to the large displacement, the BODs were launched to a lesser degree of readiness. Therefore, a number installation work complicated due to the need to carry out afloat. The increase in the thickness of the sheets and the dimensions of the profiles of a number of designs led to a reduction in the dimensions of the sections, which increased the cost and duration of the assembly. The estimated cost of the lead ship was about 32 million rubles, the third - about 26 million rubles.
Tests of the head BOD "Admiral Zozulya" began in April 1967 in the Baltic and continued until December, ending in the White Sea. During the tests, as usual, running and seaworthiness, unsinkability and survivability, weapons and weapons were checked. Firing missiles (in the telemetric version) of the P-35 complex were carried out both at full (300 km) and at minimum (30 km) range with single missiles and two-rocket volleys from the installations of both sides at the target. The Volna air defense system fired the V-600 combat missiles at parachute targets (dropped by the Il-28 bomber), at the large ship shield and at the wave control boat. In total, 12 missiles were used up, launched from each launcher and from each guide. The AK-725 gun mounts fired at the air cone and at the towed sea shield. The distance to the air target was 2000 m, to the sea one - 3000 m. Then they fired from RBU-1000 and RBU-6000 with six- and twelve-bomb volleys at a shield with a hydroacoustic reflector. In contrast to the surface tests of the helicopter on the RRC Project 58. the program of his tests on the "Admiral Zozulya" was exceptionally large-scale. They flew day and night, “on foot” and on the go, on calm water and when rolling. Landing approaches were carried out at various heading angles. During the flights, the helicopter practiced torpedo and bombing, setting up the RGAB, drive and communication systems. On the ship, aircraft technical equipment and helicopter basing support systems were checked. The tests were successful and confirmed the design TFE, as well as the combat capabilities of the ship.
Based on the test results, 20 prototype weapons, mechanisms and equipment were put into service. Among them are the Binom launcher, KT-72 and ZiF-102 launchers, RSL lifts, ASDG-500/1 diesel generator and much more.
At the same time, shortcomings were also noted, among which the most noticeable and, unfortunately, unremovable were the unsatisfactory shelling patterns of the AK-725 AU and the ZiF-102 bow launcher, the unsatisfactory operation of the sonar, the lack of a second navigation radar, etc. There were also proposals to increase the number crew, according to the state, consisting of 30 officers, 20 midshipmen and 262 foremen and sailors, but then they were rejected. Nevertheless, during the operation, the regular number of the crew (and this became almost a law) increased significantly. For example, in 1982, 46 officers and 54 midshipmen served on the Admiral Zozulya BOD, which, of course, had a very negative impact on habitability.
As a result, the fleet was replenished with four more ocean-going surface ships. Three of them became part of the Northern and one of the Pacific Fleet. Apparently, this decision was dictated by the previous distribution of "related" ships Project 58 to balance the balance. True, in 1981 Sevastopol switched to KTOF. In 1983, "Vice-Admiral Drozd", and in 1990 - "Admiral Zozulya" received additional anti-aircraft weapons from two 30-mm AK-630M batteries, as well as the Don-2 radar. It soon became clear that these ships did not fully meet the existing requirements as anti-submarine ships. With the introduction of a new classification of ships and vessels of the Navy (1975), ships Project 1134 were assigned to the class of missile cruisers, although in this capacity they could be considered as such with a big stretch. The period of entry into service of the new BODs coincided with the deployment of our fleet of combat service in remote areas of the oceans. The new ships were used very intensively in the Caribbean and Mediterranean Seas and in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. NATO military experts immediately enrolled these ships in the class of URO cruisers with the code name "Kresta". Service on ships Project 1134 turned out to be a good school for many generations of our sailors and, what is very important, for combat ship helicopter pilots. The latter especially distinguished themselves in 1972, when the BOD "Vice-Admiral Drozd" in a severe storm participated in providing assistance to the emergency nuclear submarine K-19, despite the design flaw - the low location of the runway for the helicopter.
Enhanced operation and rather rare (far from the planned dates) repairs and, and most importantly, misfortunes that befell the country and its Armed Forces, did their job. Having not served a 25-year term, on May 28, 1990, Sevastopol was withdrawn from the Navy, a month later Vladivostok followed it, and a year later, in 1991, Vice Admiral Drozd, which sank while towing on cutting. The name "Vladivostok" was soon also transferred to the Pacific BOD Project 1134-B, which previously bore the name "Tallinn". Oddly enough, the oldest (lead) ship, the Admiral Zozulya, remained a long-liver. This happened due to the fact that the ship managed to undergo a very long overhaul at the Kronstadt Marine Plant before the collapse of the USSR, after which it was almost immediately decommissioned - a very characteristic story that illustrates the true state of affairs in our long-suffering fleet.
ships Project 1134 it is difficult to attribute to the masterpieces of domestic military shipbuilding, but they marked the beginning of the ensuing large series of new BODs Project 1134A and 1134B, on the basis of which, in turn, were created missile cruisers type "Atlant" ( project 1164,). At the same time, it is important to mention once again that the RRC Project 1134 became the first surface ships of our fleet with a permanent helicopter base. In this regard, they can safely be called milestones.
Quantity
Building
Project 61 - 19 units
| Name |
Factory |
Laid down |
Launched into the water |
Entry into service |
Note |
| Nikolaev, Shipyard No. 445 named after. 61 Communards (since 1962 Shipyard named after 61 Communards) - 14 units |
|||||
|
SKR-25 | from 9.10.1962 - Komsomolets of Ukraine | ||||
| SKR-44 | from 21.03.1963 - Smart | ||||
| SKR-37 | from 1.10.1964 - Agile | ||||
| Eagle | from 1.10.1964 - Brave | ||||
| Slim | |||||
| Red Caucasus | |||||
| Decisive | |||||
| smart | |||||
| Strict | |||||
| quick-witted | |||||
| Bold | |||||
| Red Crimea | |||||
| Capable | |||||
| ambulance | |||||
| Leningrad, Shipyard named after A.A. Zhdanov - 5 units |
|||||
| SKR-31 | from 1.10.1964 - Fire | ||||
| SKR-2 | from 17.02.1965 - Exemplary | ||||
| Gifted | |||||
| Glorious | |||||
| Guardian | |||||
Project 61M - 1 unit
Until 05/19/1966 and from 06/19/1992 they were classified as patrol ships.
Pr.61M, 61MP from 06/28/1977 to 10/1/1980 were classified as large missile ships.
Tactical and technical data
| Displacement, t: | |
| standard: | 3465 (from plant No. 754, 1705 - 3550, project 61M - 4010) |
| complete: | 4315 (from plant No. 754, 1705 - 4510, project 61M - 4975) |
| Dimensions, m: | |
| length: | 144 (project 61M - 146.2) |
| width: | 15,8 |
| draft: | 4.47 (from plant No. 754, 1705 - draft 4.57 m, project 61M - 4.87 m) |
| Full speed, knots: | 35.5 (project 61M - 32) |
| cruising range: | 3500 miles (18 knots), 3100 miles (24 knots), 2000 miles (30 knots), 1520 miles (34 knots) (project 61M - 4640 miles (18 knots)) |
| Autonomy, days: | 10 (project 61M - 25) |
| Power point: | 2x36000 hp GTA M-3 (from plant No. 755, 1707 - GTA M-3R, from plant No. 1710 - GTA M-3A, project 61M - GTA M-3B), 2 VFS, 4 GTG GTU-6, 600 kW each , 2 diesel generators DG-200/P, 200 kW each |
| Armament: | 4x1 launchers KT-15M-BRK Termite anti-ship missile system (4 anti-ship missiles P-15M (4K51)) - Korall-NK control system (project 61M) 2x2 launchers ZIF-101 SAM M-1 "Volna" (32 SAM V-600 (4K90)) - 2 SU 4R90 "Yatagan" (project 61M - 2x2 launchers ZIF-101 SAM M-1 "Volna-M" (32 SAM V-601 (4K91)) - 2 SU 4R90P "Yatagan II") 2x2 76 mm AK-726 (2400 rounds) - 2 MR-105 "Turret" control systems 4x6 30 mm AK-630M (12,000 rounds) - 2 MR-123 Vympel-A control systems (project 61M) 2x1 45 mm 21KM - Komsomolets of Ukraine, Nimble, Restrained, Fast (filmed in 1980), Glorious, Sharp-witted 1x5 533 mm PTA-53-61 (5 torpedoes 53-57, SET-53) - PUTS "Typhon-61" (from plant No. 1713 - 1x5 533 mm PTA-53-1123/2 (5 torpedoes SET-65) , project 61M - PUTS "Typhon-61M") 2x12 RBU-6000 "Smerch-2" (192 RSL-60) - PUSB "Storm" (Project 61M - 96 RSL-60 - PUSB "Storm-61M") 2x6 RBU-1000 "Smerch-3" (48 RSL-60) - not on project 61M 22 IGDM-500 mines or 14 KAM mines or 18 Crab Design Bureau mines or 16 KSM mines or 14 Serpey mines Acoustic guard BOCA-DU Runway for helicopter Ka-25 |
| RTV: | 2 MR-300 Angara general-purpose radars (from serial No. 754, 1705 MP-500 Kliver general-purpose radars, MR-310 Angara-A general-purpose radars), Don navigation radar (from serial No. 1708 - 2 navigation radars "Volga"), EW radar "Krab-11" (installed on SKR-2 during operation), EW radar "Krab-12" (installed on SKR-2 during operation), EW radar MR-262 "Ograda" (SKR-2, 44), EW radar MP-401 "Start" (project 61M), RTR "Bizan-4B", RTR MRP-13-14 radar (not on plant No. 1701), radar RTR MRP-15-16 "Zaliv" (project 61M), state identification equipment: 2 interrogators "Nikel-KM" (from plant No. 1708 - 4 interrogators "Nikel-KM"), 2 transponders "Khrom-KM", radio direction finder ARP-50R, GAK MGK-335 "Platina" (project 61M), GAS MG-312 "Titan" (serial number 753, 1702 - MG-312E "Titan", serial number 1712 - MG-312I "Titan" , not on project 61M), sonar MG-311 "Vychegda" (not on project 61M), sonar VGS-2 "Oka-M" (project 61M), sonar of sound underwater communication MG-26 "Khosta" (not on No. 1701), GAS for receiving signals from sonar buoys MG-409P (project 61M), station for detecting the radiation wake of the submarine MI-110R ( from plant No. 1707, installed on the rest during operation), a station for detecting the thermal wake of the submarine MI-110K (from plant No. 1707, installed on the rest during operation), CICS "Tablet-61", control system with weapons "Pult- 61M" PK-16 electronic warfare complex (4 KL-101 launchers) - 128 rounds AZ-TST-60, AZ-TSP-60UM (since 1991), AZ-TSTM-60U (since 1994) (project 61M) |
| Crew, people: | 266 (22 officers, 18 warrant officers) (since 1974 - 269 (25 officers, 18 warrant officers), project 61M - 320 (29 officers, 42 warrant officers)) |
General form
Project upgrades
Project 61MP - 5 units: Leningrad Shipyard im. A.A. Zhdanov - Glorious 6.08.1973-30.09.1975, Smart 22.11.1972-25.12.74, SKR-31 10.02.1971-29.12.1973, Nikolaev Shipyard named after 61 Communards - Slender 28.12.1975-30.09.1975, Bold 11.12. 1972-30.12.1974. Brought to the level of project 61M. GTA was replaced by M-3E, GTG by GTU-6A (Smyshlyony - GTU-6M2). Bold, Slender, Smart - PTA-52-1123/2, Glorious, SKR-31 - PTA-53-61. 2 MR-300 Angara general detection radars were left on SKR-31: in 1982 they were replaced by MR-310 Angara-A and MR-500 Cleaver 1.02.1980-3.12.1982. Not installed on Glorious electronic warfare complex PC-16. On the Bold OGAS VGS-2 "Oka-M". On 1 unit of the Black Sea Fleet OGAS MG-349 "Ros-K"
Project 61E - 1 unit: Agile 03/23/1974-11/5/1976 in Nikolaev Shipyard named after 61 Communards. 3810/4750 t, draft 4.65 m, 1 * 1 launcher ZS90 SAM M-22 "Uragan" (24 SAM 9M38, 9M38V1A, 9M38UDR) - SU 3R-90 instead of SAM M-1 "Volna", general detection radar MR -710 "Fregat-M" and general detection radar MR-310 "Angara-A" instead of MR-300 "Angara", EW radar MP-401 "Start", control system with weapons "Pult-61KE" instead of "Pult-61M", EW PK-16 complex (PU KL-101) - AZ-TST-60 rounds, 296 people (25 officers, 40 midshipmen), 25 days
Project 01090 – 1 unit: Sevmorzavod im. S. Ordzhonikidze 02/19/1987-1995. The aft AK-726, RBU-1000, runway for the helicopter were removed, the non-acoustic detection complex MNK-300 "Kaira", the MR-212 "Vaigach" navigation radar instead of 2 "Volga" navigation radars, the PK-10 "Smely" electronic warfare system (4 launchers KT-216) - shots AZ-SO-50, AZ-SR-50, AZ-SOM-50, AZ-SK-50, AZ-SMZ-50, EW PK-16 complex (4 launchers KL-101) - shots AZ-TST-60, AZ-TSP-60UM, AZ-TSTM-60U. In 2002, 2 * 4 launchers KT-184 3K24 Uran anti-ship missiles (8 3M24 anti-ship missiles) were added. Then 2 MR-231 navigation radars were added
Project 01091 – 0+1 unit: Capable in Sevastopol “Sevmorzavod” im. S. Ordzhonikidze since 07/30/1987. Removed stern AK-726, runway for helicopter Ka-25. For testing means of non-acoustic detection of submarines
Since 1968, the M-1 "Volna" air defense system has been modernized into "Volna-M" (SAM V-601 (4K91)): Krasny Kavkaz, Oryol in 1969, Sharp-witted, SKR-25 23.05.1977-7.08.1978
Since 1976, the Volna-11 air defense system has been modernized into Volna-P: SKR-25. Since 1979 SU 4R90 "Yatagan" has been modernized into 4R90P "Yatagan II"
SAM "Volna-M" is being upgraded into "Volna-N" (SAM V-601M): Sharp-witted in 1984
SAM "Volna-N" is being upgraded to "Volna-11" (SAM V-611)
Since 1976, the Volna-11 air defense system has been modernized into Volna-P: SKR-25
Since 1973, the Typhon-61 PUTS has been replaced by the Ladoga PUTS (torpedoes 53-65K, SET-65)
On Sobratitelny 1.10.1976-28.11.1978, Gifted in 1978-03.1980, 2 MR-300 Angara general detection radars were replaced by Angara-A MR-310 general detection radars
No. 751-755, 1701-1707 added the 2nd Don navigation radar
For serial number 751-755, 1701-1707, 2 Don navigation radars were replaced by 2 Volga navigation radars (serial number 1707 - 1 Volga navigation radar)
No. 751-755, 1701-1707 added 2 interrogators "Nickel-KM"
On Soobrazitelny 1.10.1976-28.11.1978, Gifted in 1978-03.1980, the GAS MG-312E "Titan" was replaced by the GAS MG-312I "Titan"
Anti-sabotage OGAS MG-7 "Bracelet" has been installed since 1977 (except for plant No. 1703, 1704)
In 1977-79, the station for detecting the radiation wake of the submarine MI-110R, the station for detecting the thermal wake of the submarine MI-110K were replaced by the station for detecting the thermal wake of the submarine MI-110KM
The PK-2 electronic warfare system (PU ZIF-121) was installed on Skory - AZ-TST-41, AZ-PTST-41, AZ-TSP-47, AZ-TST-47, AZ-TSV-47, AZ-TSO- 47 (since 1985), AZ-TSR-47 (since 1991) - SU "Tertia"
Since 1987, the PK-16 electronic warfare complex (PU KL-101) has been installed - shots AZ-TST-60, AZ-TSP-60UM (since 1991), AZ-TSTM-60U (since 1994)
Since 1987, the PK-10 "Brave" electronic warfare complex (PU KT-216) has been installed - shots AZ-SO-50, AZ-SR-50, AZ-SOM-50 (since 1989), AZ-SK-50 (since 1991) , AZ-SMZ-50 (since 1993)
Unrealized modifications: Project 61A, Project 61K, Project 61bis
Fleet distribution
bf: Exemplary, Fire (since 10/12/1971 SF), Glorious
Black Sea Fleet: Komsomolets of Ukraine, Red Caucasus, Red Crimea, Courageous, Agile, Decisive, Restrained, Fast, Bold (since 01/30/1985 bf), Sharp-witted, Quick-witted (since 08/6/1982 SF)
SF: Gifted (since 10/8/1966 Pacific Fleet), smart, slender
Pacific Fleet: Capable (since 10/29/1992 Black Sea Fleet), Guardian, Strict
Board numbers
Komsomolets Ukrainy: 810(1962), 296(1963), 552(1966), 810(1970), 521(1971), 182(1972), 527(1972), 538(1973?), 169(1975), 709 , 722(1979), 712(1981), 714(1982), 713(1983), 716(1983), 710, 703(1986), 715(1990), 1701(1993)
Red Caucasus: 521(1967), 571(1967), 383(1967), 186(1973), 531(1975), 527, 151(1977), 720(1978), 729(1978), 722(1980), 720(1981), 171(1981), 710(1981), 733(1983), 702(1984), 707(1987), 710(1987), 729(1991), 820(1993), 179
Red Crimea: 538(1971), 536(1971), 532(1973), 540(1973), 182(1974), 186(1975), 181(1975), 530(1976), 154(1977), 151( 1977), 191(1978), 720(1978), 711(1981), 710(1984), 713(1984), 729(1985), 715(1988), 703(1.05.1990), 814(04.1993)
Model: 080(1965), 501(1966), 190(1967), 564(1967), 504(1969), 501(1971), 518(1972), 501(1974), 520(1975), 514(1976) ), 430(1978), 446(1981), 425(1982), 433(1985), 435(1990)
Firing: 083(1965), 544(1967), 480(1971), 581(1973), 291(1975), 299(1975), 241(1978), 296(61MP), 433, 518, 622(1984) 642(1984), 602(1989)
Gifted: 084(1965), 089(1965), 049(1966), 561(1967), 054, 570(1970), 562(1970), 108, 143(1976), 103(1978), 583(1981) 566(1985), 564, 587(1991)
Courageous: 393(1965), 525, 523(1968), 528(1970), 197(1971), 520(1972), 184(1972), 532(1973), 530(1974)
Agile: 027(1964), 078(1964), 383(1964), 296(1964), 216, 653(1966), 540(1969), 530(1970), 374(1971), 533(1972), 535 (1973), 179(1973), 190, 164(1975), 175(1976), 707(1978), 724(1981), 707(1984), 710(1987), 713(1990)
Resolute: 529(1967), 381(1967?), 368(1971?), 524(1971), 534?, 529(1972), 536(1973), 196(1973), 156(1975), 159(1977) ), 724(1978), 720(1978), 758(1978), 722(1981), 705(1984), 711(1989), 708(1990), 818(1993)
Restrained: 534(1973), 173(1975), 160(1975), 254(1978), 288(1979), 286(1979), 737(1983), 734(1983), 711(1984), 705(1986) ), 706?, 702(1.05.1990), 804(04.1993)
Ambulance: 537(1972), 177(1973), 533(1973), 166(1973), 191(04.1975), 153(1975), 173(1977), 753(1977), 733(1978), 164(1978) ), 729(1981), 715(1984), 702(1987), 705(1990), 805(1992)
Glorious: 653(1966), 161(1968), 515(1968), 506(1970), 244(1972), 505(1972), 229, 503(1977), 177(1978), 373(1978), 340 (1979), 462(1981), 487(1985), 483(1987), 480(1989), 340(1989), 449(1989), 348(Rev.61MP)
Bold: 531(1969), 535(1970), 358(1970), 370(1970), 529(1974), 167(1975), 166?(1975), 173(1976), 165(1976), 171( 1977), 257(1978), 252(1978), 440(1980), 739(1981), 720(1981), 702, 410(1987), 724(1988), 444(Rev.61MP)
Sharp-witted: 537(1969), 527(1972), 534(1974), 178(1975), 152(1977), 710(1978), 701(1980), 745(1981), 715, 178(1985), 717 (1987), 714(1990), 810(1993), 870(01.2016)
Smart: 525(1968), 297(1969), 552(1970), 297(1972), 587(1974), 556(1976), 291(1976), 296(1977), 337(1978), 317(1979) ), 614(1980), 648(1981), 635(1985), 614(1987), 644(05.1990)
Smart: 215(1963), 374(1963), 524(1963), 078(1964), 535(1967), 528(1967), 536(1967), 871(1968), 524(1969), 530(1971) ), 532(1972), 528(1973), 179(1974), 175(1975), 717(1981), 660(1982), 632(1985), 611(1.05.1990), 604(1992)
Able: 522(1971), 561(1972), 109(7/10/1973), 102(1975), 564(1975), 544(04/1975), 142(1976), 547(1978), 527, 522(1980) 544(1982), 531(1984), 505(1985), 578(1987)
Guardian: 504(1966), 580(1967), 504(1971), 585(1973), 140(1975), 150(1976), 563(1980), 565(1982), 580(1986), 624
Strict: 528(1968), 564(1971), 543(1971), 107(1973), 504(1974), 528(1975), 141?(1977?), 100(1977), 574(1985), 545 (1985), 504(1989), 580(1991)
Slim: 382(1966), 545(1967), 525(1970), 557(1972), 550, 734(1977), 610(1981), 640(08.1984), 642?, 619(1987), 660(1990) )
Write-off
1974 - Brave (30.08 sank after an explosion and a fire in the aft cellar of a missile defense system near Sevastopol)
1989 - Fire (25.04)
1990 - Gifted (19.04), Slender (12.04), Agile (21.08)
1991 - Glorious (24.06), Komsomolets of Ukraine (24.06)
1992 - Quick-witted (3.07)
1993 - Red Crimea (24.06), Smart (22.02), Able (20.11), Guardian (30.06), Strict (30.06), Exemplary (30.06)
1996 - Resolute (8.07)
1997 - Fast (17.07)
1998 - Red Caucasus (16.03)
2001 - Restrained (3.05)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| "Red Caucasus" | |
|---|---|
| Service: | USSR USSR |
| Vessel class and type | Large anti-submarine ship |
| Organization | USSR |
| Manufacturer | CVD them. 61 Communards (Nikolaev) |
| Construction started | July 18 |
| Launched into the water | June 15 |
| Commissioned | September 25 |
| Withdrawn from the Navy | The 1 of May |
| Status | cut into metal |
| Main characteristics | |
| Displacement | 3400 (standard) 4300 (full) |
| Length | 131.96 m (DWL) 143.95 m (largest) |
| Width | 13.99 m (dc) 15.78 m (largest) |
| Draft | 4.47 m (average) |
| Engines | GTU |
| Power | 46,800 (according to other sources, 72,000) l. With. |
| travel speed | 30.24 knots (full) 34-35 knots (maximum) |
| cruising range | 1520 miles at 33 knots 2700 (according to other sources - 3500) miles at 18 knots |
| Autonomy of navigation | 10 days (according to provisions) |
| Crew | 266 people (including 22 officers) |
| Armament | |
| Radar weapons | 2 detection radars VTs and NTs MR-310 2 MP-105 artillery fire control radar |
| Electronic weapons | GAS all-round review "Titan" |
| Flak | 2x2 76mm AK-726 gun |
| Missile weapons | 2x2 launchers SAM "Volna" |
| Anti-submarine weapons | 2x12 213 mm RBU-6000 (192 RSL-60) 2x6 305 mm RBU-1000 (48 RGB-10) |
| Mine and torpedo armament | 1x5 533 mm TA PTA-53-61 |
| Aviation group | 1 Ka-25 helicopter, no hangar. |
"Red Caucasus"- Soviet large anti-submarine ship of project 61.
Story
He was in the Mediterranean during the Arab-Israeli conflicts in 1967 and 1973 and provided assistance to the Arab countries.
From March to September 1983, a major overhaul took place in the city of Nikolaev at the plant named after. 61 Communards.
Write a review on the article "Red Caucasus (large anti-submarine ship)"
Links
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An excerpt characterizing the Red Caucasus (a large anti-submarine ship)
- Hurts.- Your honor, to the general. Here they are standing in a hut, - said the fireworks, approaching Tushin.
- Now, dove.
Tushin got up and, buttoning his overcoat and recovering, walked away from the fire ...
Not far from the fire of the artillerymen, in a hut prepared for him, Prince Bagration was sitting at dinner, talking with some of the commanders of the units who had gathered at his place. There was an old man with half-closed eyes, greedily nibbling at a mutton bone, and a twenty-two-year-old impeccable general, flushed from a glass of vodka and dinner, and a staff officer with a personalized ring, and Zherkov, uneasily looking around at everyone, and Prince Andrei, pale, with pursed lips and feverishly shining eyes.
In the hut stood a taken French banner leaning in the corner, and the auditor, with a naive face, felt the fabric of the banner and, perplexed, shook his head, perhaps because he was really interested in the appearance of the banner, or maybe because it was hard for him. hungry to look at dinner, for which he did not get the device. In a neighboring hut there was a French colonel taken prisoner by the dragoons. Our officers crowded around him, examining him. Prince Bagration thanked individual commanders and asked about the details of the case and about the losses. The regimental commander, who introduced himself near Braunau, reported to the prince that as soon as the case began, he retreated from the forest, gathered woodcutters and, letting them past him, with two battalions hit with bayonets and overturned the French.
- As I saw, Your Excellency, that the first battalion was upset, I stood on the road and thought: “I will let these ones pass and meet with battle fire”; did so.
The regimental commander so wanted to do this, he was so sorry that he did not have time to do this, that it seemed to him that all this had definitely happened. Maybe it even really happened? Was it possible to make out in this confusion what was and what was not?
“Moreover, I must note, Your Excellency,” he continued, recalling Dolokhov’s conversation with Kutuzov and his last meeting with the demoted one, “that the private, demoted Dolokhov, captured a French officer in front of my eyes and especially distinguished himself.
“Here, Your Excellency, I saw the attack of the Pavlogradites,” Zherkov, looking around uneasily, intervened, who did not see the hussars at all that day, but only heard about them from an infantry officer. - They crushed two squares, your excellency.
Some smiled at Zherkov's words, as they always expected a joke from him; but, noticing that what he said was also leaning towards the glory of our weapons and of the present day, they took on a serious expression, although many knew very well that what Zherkov said was a lie, based on nothing. Prince Bagration turned to the old colonel.
- Thank you all, gentlemen, all units acted heroically: infantry, cavalry and artillery. How are two guns left in the center? he asked, looking for someone with his eyes. (Prince Bagration did not ask about the guns of the left flank; he already knew that all the guns were thrown there at the very beginning of the case.) “I think I asked you,” he turned to the staff officer on duty.
- One was hit, - the officer on duty answered, - and the other, I cannot understand; I myself was there all the time and took orders, and I had just left... It was hot, really,' he added modestly.
Large anti-submarine ships of project 61 and 61 ME
Large anti-submarine ship (BOD) is a class of ships of the Soviet and Russian navies, introduced on May 19, 1966. In accordance with the name, the ships of the class are primarily designed to combat submarines of a potential enemy in the ocean zone. In the navies of other countries, the class of large anti-submarine ships corresponds to the destroyer (DD). In the USSR, the BOD class included warships special construction of projects 61, 1134, 1134A, 1134B, 1135, 1155, 1155.1 as well as ships of projects 56-PLO and 57-A converted from other classes. For 2012 as part of the Navy Russian Federation 11 ships of the "large anti-submarine ship" class (types 1134B (1), 61 (1), 1155 (8) and 1155.1 (1)) continue to carry out combat service.
Signs BOD Komsomolets of Ukraine.
 |
.JPG) |
Large anti-submarine ship Komsomolets of Ukraine- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched December 31, 1960. and entered service on December 31, 1962. under the name " SKR-25". In October 1962 renamed to . November 23, 1964 was included in the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KChF). From 5 to 30 June 1967 performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt, then as part of the 5th squadron of the Navy in 1970. took part in the maneuvers "Ocean". In 1981 from June 16 to July 1, participates in the "Shield-82" exercises. In 1984 participates in the exercises "Ocean", and in 1985. in the exercises "Granit-85". Board numbers: 810(1962), 296(1963), 552(1966), 521(1969), 810(1970), 182(1972), 527(1972), 538(1974), 169(1975), 709, 722(1979), 712(1981), 714(1982), 713(1983), 716(1983), 710, 703(1988), 715(1990), 1701(1993). Decommissioned: 1991
Signs BOD Red Caucasus.
Large anti-submarine ship Krasny Kavkaz- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on February 9, 1966. and entered service on September 25, 1967. and already October 13, 1967. became part of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KChF). Awarded the Guards Naval Flag, inherited from the cruiser of the same name Black Sea Fleet. In June 1967 and from January 1 to December 31, 1968. performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt. In the spring of 1970 participated in the maneuvers "Ocean". In October 1973 performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Syria. Board numbers: 521(1967), 571(1967), 186(1973), 182(1974), 531(1975), 527, 151(1977), 720(1978), 729(1978), 722(1980), 720(1981), 171(1981), 710(1981), 733(1983), 702(1984), 703(1986), 707(1987), 710(1987), 729(1991), 820(1993), 179. Decommissioned: May 10, 1998 solemnly lowered the Guards St. Andrew's flag, which was raised the next day on the missile cruiser Moskva.
Signs BOD Red Crimea.
Large anti-submarine ship Krasny Krym- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on February 28, 1969. and entered service on October 15, 1970, and already on October 20, 1970. became part of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KCHF) and June 30, 1970. was awarded the Guards Naval Flag, inherited from the Black Sea Fleet cruiser of the same name. In May 1971 and February 1972. performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt. June 1, 1992 reclassified to the TFR and was assigned to the 30th division of surface ships with tail number 814. Board numbers: 521 (1967), 571 (1967), 186 (1973), 182 (1974), 531 (1975), 527, 151 (1977), 720(1978), 729(1978), 722(1980), 720(1981), 171(1981), 710(1981), 733(1983), 702(1984), 703(1986), 707 (1987), 710(1987), 729(1991), 820(1993), 179. Decommissioned: 1993.
Signs BOD Exemplary.
Large anti-submarine ship Exemplary- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on February 23, 1964, under the name " SKR-2", and entered service on September 29, 1965, and already on November 2, 1965. became part of the Twice Red Banner Baltic Fleet (DKBF). February 17, 1965 renamed to "Exemplary". In the spring of 1970 participated in the maneuvers "Ocean". From June 29 to July 10, 1970, he performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt. Board numbers: 080(1965), 501(1966), 190(1967), 564(1967), 504(1970), 501(1971), 518(1972), 501(1974), 520(1975), 514( 1976), 430(1979), 425(1982), 446(1983), 433(1985), 435(1990). Decommissioned: 1993
Signs BOD Gifted.
 |
Large anti-submarine ship Gifted- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on September 11, 1964. and entered service on December 30, 1965, and already on January 11, 1966. became part of the Red Banner Northern Fleet (KSF). In 1966 joined the special expedition and made the transition from the Kola Bay to Vladivostok along the Northern Sea Route, where on October 8, 1966. became part of the Red Banner Pacific Fleet (KTOF). Board numbers: 084(1965), 049(1966), 561(1967), 054(1967), 582(1970), 143(1976), 562(1980), 583(1981), 103(1983), 583( 1984), 566(1985), 108, 564, 587(1991). Decommissioned: 1990
Signs BOD Ognevoy.
 |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched May 31, 1963. and entered service on December 31, 1964, and already on January 21, 1965. became part of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet (KBF). October 12, 1972 modernized according to project 61-M, after which it was transferred to the Red Banner Northern Fleet (KSF). Board numbers: 083(1965), 544(1967), 480(1971), 581(1973), 299(1977), 241(1978), 296(61MP), 433, 518, 622(1984), 642(1984) ), 602(1989). Decommissioned: 1989
Large anti-submarine ship Brave.
Signs BOD Brave.
.jpg)
Large anti-submarine ship Otvazhny- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on October 17, 1964. under the name "Eagle" and entered service on December 31, 1965, and was renamed to. January 25, 1965, became part of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KChF). From 5 to 30 June 1967 performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt. Participated in exercises in 1971. "South-71" and in 1970. "Ocean" . On August 30, 1974, a severe fire broke out on the ship, as a result of a spontaneous launch of an anti-aircraft guided missile. Sunk while being towed. Board numbers: 393(1965), 525, 523(1968), 528(1970), 197(1971), 520(1972), 184(1972), 530(1974). Decommissioned: 1974
Badges BOD Agile.
.JPG) |
 |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
Large anti-submarine ship Agile - built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched February 29, 1972. under the name "SKR-37" and entered service on December 30, 1973, and was renamed to. January 22, 1965 became part of the Black Sea Fleet. In June 1967 and from January 1 to December 31, 1968. performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt. In 1974 modernized according to the project 61E.
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
In 1971 took part in the exercises "South. In October 1973, he performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Syria. Since 1982, he has been part of the 70th brigade of the 30th division of anti-submarine ships of the KChF. Board numbers: 027 (1964), 078 (1964 ), 383(1964), 216, 653(1966), 530(1970), 374(1971), 533(1972), 535(1973), 179(1973), 190, 164(1976), 175(1976) , 707(1978), 724(1981), 707(1984), 710(1987), 713(1990).Decommissioned: 1990.
Large anti-submarine ship Resolute.
Signs of BOD Resolute.
Large anti-submarine ship Resolute - built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched June 30, 1966. and entered service on December 30, 1967, and already on January 11, 1968. became part of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KChF). From 1 to 31 June 1967 and from April 1 to December 31, 1968. performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt. In 1970 took part in the maneuvers "Ocean". In 1989 decommissioned and mothballed. Further in 1996. sold for scrap. Board numbers: 529(1967), 524(1971), 529(1972), 536(1973), 196(1973), 156(1975), 159(1977), 724(1978), 720(1978), 758( 1978), 705(1984), 711(1989), 708(1990), 818(1993). Decommissioned: 1996
Large anti-submarine ship Restrained - built as part of project 61-M. Since June 28, 1977 to October 1, 1980 classified as large missile ships. Launched February 29, 1972. and entered service on December 30, 1973, and already on February 7, 1974. became part of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KChF).
.JPG) |
 |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
In 1984 - participated in the exercises "Ocean". Since 1987 part of the 150th brigade of surface ships of the KChF (tail number 702), and after its disbandment in October 1990. - in the 30th division of the KChF. Since January 1992 the ship was reclassified to the TFR and received tail number 804 and became part of the 30th division of surface ships (DINK). Board numbers: 534(1973), 173(1975), 160(1975), 254(1978), 286(1979), 288(1979), 737, 734(1983), 711(1984), 705(1986), 702(1988), 804(01.1992). Decommissioned: 2001
Signs BOD Fast.
.JPG) |
 |
Large anti-submarine ship Fast - Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on February 26, 1971. and entered service on September 23, 1972, and already on October 31, 1972. became a member of the CCF.
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
From 5 to 24 October 1973 performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt. In 1974 Together with the Leningrad anti-ship missiles, it participates in the demining of the Gulf of Suez, ensuring the safety of combat trawling. Board numbers: 537(1972), 177(1973), 533(1973), 166(1973), 173, 153(1975), 191(04.1975), 753(1977), 733(1978), 164(1978), 729(1982), 715(1984), 702(1987), 705(1990), 805(1992). Decommissioned: 1997
Signs BOD Glorious.
Large anti-submarine ship Slavny - built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched April 24, 1965. and entered service on September 30, 1966, and already on October 17, 1966. became part of the Twice Red Banner Baltic Fleet (DKBF). June 14 to July 29, 1972 performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt and Syria. Between 1973 and to 1975 was under modernization under the project 61-M. Board numbers: 537(1972), 177(1973), 533(1973), 166(1973), 173, 153(1975), 191(04.1975), 753(1977), 733(1978), 164(1978), 729(1982), 715(1984), 702(1987), 705(1990), 805(1992). Decommissioned: 1997
Signs of BOD Courageous.
Large anti-submarine ship Smely
- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on February 6, 1968. and entered service on December 27, 1969, and already on January 9, 1970. became part of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KChF). .JPG)
August 28, 1976 - Together with the Cruiser "Zhdanov" urgently comes to the area of the collision of our nuclear submarine K-22 "Red Guard" with the American frigate USS FF-1047 Voge. In 1977 upgraded to project 61M. January 30, 1985 became part of the Twice Red Banner Baltic Fleet (DKBF). January 19, 1988 leased to the Polish Navy and renamed "Warszawa". On March 5, 1988, he was expelled from the USSR Navy. Board numbers: 531(1969), 535(1970), 358(1970), 167(1975), 173(1976), 165(1976), 171(1977), 252(1978), 257(1978), 440( 1980), 739(1981), 720(1981), 702, 410(1987), 724(1988), 529(61MP), 444(61MP). Decommissioned: 1988
Signs of BOD Sharp-witted.
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
Large anti-submarine ship Smetlivy - built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on August 26, 1967. and entered service on September 25, 1969, and already on October 21, 1969. became part of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KChF). February 19, 1987 it was put in repair, and then immediately for modernization, which, together with the repair, lasted 10 years. In 1997 entered service. In 2003 as part of a group of ships of the Black Sea Fleet, he participated in ocean-going naval exercises in the Indian Ocean together with the Pacific Fleet and the Indian Navy, and in 2011. took part in the Russian-Italian naval exercises "Ioniex-2011" in the Mediterranean Sea. Board numbers: 537(1969), 527(1972), 534(1974), 178(1975), 152(1977), 710(1978), 701(1980), 745(1981), 178(1985), 717( 1987), 714(1990), 810(1993), 715. Decommissioned: Still serving today.
Signs BOD Quick-witted.
Large anti-submarine ship Soobrazitelny - built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on October 4, 1961. under the name "SKR-44" and March 21, 1963. has been renamed to . She entered service on December 26, 1963, and on November 23, 1963. became part of the Black Sea Fleet (KChF).
During his service, he wore the Guards Naval flag, inherited from the destroyer of the same name of project 7-U of the Black Sea Fleet. From 1 to 31 June 1967 and from January 1 to December 31, 1968, he performed a combat mission to assist the armed forces of Egypt. August 6, 1982 transferred to the Red Banner Northern Fleet (KSF). Board numbers: 215(1963), 374(1963), 524(1963), 078, 528(1967), 536(1968), 524(1969), 871(1969), 530(1971), 532(1972), 528(1973), 179(1974), 175(1975), 717(1981), 660(1982), 632(1985), 611(1.05.1990), 604(1992). Decommissioned: 1992
Signs BOD Capable.
.JPG) |
Large anti-submarine ship Capable - built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched April 11, 1970. and entered service on September 25, 1971, and already on October 27, 1971. became part of the Red Banner Pacific Fleet (KTOF). In 1987 put on overhaul, where the life of the ship ended, then it was given to "Sevmorzavod" in payment of debts of the Navy to the enterprise. In 1993 dismantled weapons and then sold it to India for metal. Board numbers: 522(1971), 109(1972), 102(1975), 142(1976), 547(1978), 522(1980), 544(1982), 531(1984), 505(1985), 578( 1987). Decommissioned: 1993
Signs BOD Strict.
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
 |
.JPG) |
Large anti-submarine ship Strict - built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched April 29, 1967. and entered service on December 24, 1968, and already on January 8, 1969. became part of the Red Banner Pacific Fleet (KTOF). Board numbers: 528(1968), 564(1971), 543(1971), 504(1974), 528(1975), 100(1977), 545(1985), 504(1989), 580(1991). Decommissioned: 1993
Signs BOD Slender.
Large anti-submarine ship Slender - built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched on July 28, 1965. and entered service on December 15, 1966, and already on December 30, 1966. became part of the Red Banner Northern Fleet (KSF). September 04, 1967 a fire broke out on the K-3 submarine - the MB-52 tug, the Beshtau rescue, the Stroyny large anti-submarine ship and the Zheleznyakov cruiser were sent to help. Since 1975 to 1981 was on modernization in Nikolaev and November 6, 1980. assigned to the project 61-MP. In 1984 participated in the exercises "Ocean". January 15, 1985 entered combat service in the Mediterranean Sea, the tasks of which were carried out jointly with TAKR "Kyiv", RKR "Vice Admiral Drozd", BOD "Marshal Timoshenko", and the destroyer "Modern". From August 28 to September 26, 1988 supervised the NATO exercise "Team Work-88" in the Norwegian Sea. Board numbers: 382(1966), 545(1967), 525(1970), 557(1975), 734(1977), 610(1981), 640(08.1984), 642?, 619(1987), 660(1990) . Decommissioned: 1990
Large anti-submarine ship Guardian.
Signs BOD Guardian.
 |
Large anti-submarine ship Guardian- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships.
The badge is dedicated to 3 projects of destroyers "Guarding"
The first destroyer would have been sunk by the Japanese fleet during the Russian-Japanese outing of 1905-1907. In 1911, the feat of the crew was immortalized in a bronze composition against the background of a cross - it consists of two sailors: one with an effort opens the porthole, from which water is gushing, and the other - kingstones, which was installed in Alexander Park.
The second destroyer was killed in an unequal battle with Nazi aircraft.
The third ship that began to bear this name was the BOD 61 project. Launched February 20, 1966. and entered service on December 21, 1966, and already on January 7, 1967. became part of the Red Banner Pacific Fleet (KTOF).
Board numbers: 504 (1966), 580 (1967), 504 (1971), 585 (1973), 140 (1976), 563 (1980), 565 (1982), 580 (1986), 150, 624. Decommissioned: 1993 .
Signs BOD Solid.
Large anti-submarine ship- built as part of the 61ME project. Launched March 12, 1983. and entered service on December 30, 1985, and already on December 30, 1985. became part of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet (KChF). April 21, 1986 became part of the Indian Navy - the destroyer "Ranvir".Board numbers: 724 (1985).
Large anti-submarine ship Smart.
Signs BOD Smart.
 |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
Large anti-submarine ship smart- built as part of project 61. Until May 19, 1966. and since June 1, 1992. classified as patrol ships. Launched into the water
 |
.jpg) |
October 22, 1966 and entered service on September 27, 1968, and already on October 21, 1968. became part of the Red Banner Northern Fleet (KSF). Took part in the maneuvers "Ocean" in 1970 In 1975 took part in the operational-strategic exercise "Ocean-75". In 1975 - 1977, it was modernized according to the 61-MP project.
Since 1978 part of the 120th brigade missile ships, carries out military service in the Atlantic. Together with the TARKR "Kirov", the BOD "Admiral Isakov" and "Stroyny" took part in the exercises "North-81" in 1981.AT 1986 - a long-distance voyage in the Mediterranean Sea as part of (KUG) BOD "Fire" and RK "Vice-Admiral Drozd".
Board numbers 525(1968), 297(1969), 552(1971), 587(1974), 291(1976), 296(1977), 337(1978), 317(1979), 614(1980), 648(1981) ), 614(1987), 635(1988), 644(05.1990). Decommissioned: 1993